We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Structural defect warranty

Hi,
As a developer where do I stand in regards that I bought Structural warranties through CRL/ALPHA.
I sold two houses in 2017 & wondered following Alpha going into liquidation am I still liable to provide new cover for the owners who have received a small cheque from FSCS.
I obviously took out the cover in good faith.

Comments

  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,082 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I don't see why you would be.

    You provided it at the time in good faith. There's no legal requirement to have one or ensure that the providers don't go bump - obviously you wanted one to be able to sell to people needing a mortgage, but I can't see how your legal obligations would go beyond any other normal house transaction - ie. the buyer buys the house as-is; it's their job to do due diligence at the time and caveat emptor still applies as long as you (the vendor) don't lie.
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • pinkteapot
    pinkteapot Posts: 8,044 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Agree with Doozergirl, unless you had a strange clause in your contracts promising to ensure a warranty remained in place for the full 10 years.

    You advertised houses with a 10 year warranty and supplied a 10 year warranty. We're in the process of buying a new build and are aware of the risk of the warranty company going bust in the future. I wouldn't have dreamed of the builder being liable for that!

    If your buyers have come back to you and are having a moan, I'd politely tell them to go away. They're chancing their arm.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.