We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Section 20s - A Cautionary Tale

Hi all,

I had a recent experience that I wanted to share, in case it helps anyone else avoid the same issue.

We were buying a flat in a small block that was part of a larger council estate. The council were the freeholder. In the many bundles of paperwork that came through were several bits and pieces from the council relating to service charges etc. One bit related to current or upcoming section 20 works - of which there were none. It also specifically stated that there were no works being planned in the near future. Great!

I assumed that it wouldn't be possible for them to lie - or, at the least, withhold information - in this kind of document. As it turned out, they were weeks away from sending section 20s out to most of the flats on the estate. And not small ones.

Luckily for us, one came through before exchange. It prompted us to look more closely into it, and through some extensive googling found out that it was just the start of a major redevelopment plan for the estate, likely to cost a staggering amount - more than our deposit.

Ultimately, it would have been on us for not digging into it. We're FTBs so a lot of this stuff is unknown to us. But the fact that they gave us information that was so unashamedly untrue did come as a bit of a shock. I come away from this experience feeling wiser and more suspicious!

To anyone looking into buying a council place, I'd say - google the estate, talk to the neighbours, find out if there is a residents' association. Ask the council for any recent condition reports that have been done, as these might suggest that the place is in need of repair. Check whether major works have been done in the last 10 years - if not, then they may be overdue. When were the pipes last done? The roof? Get a structural survey done. Read and understand your lease! What would you be required to chip in for? Is there a sinking fund? If not, you could be on the line for many years - possibly decades - worth of remedial work that general maintenance charges won't cover.

There's always going to be a risk that works are upcoming. But do what you can to find out the likelihood of them being imminent, and of what scale.

As a homeowner, you have very little power in objecting to a section 20. The chances are the work will be needed and you will need to contribute to the bill. Many councils are now bringing their housing up to meet standards. Make sure you do you homework and take into account the risks that may come with a ex-council property.

Comments

  • ThePants999
    ThePants999 Posts: 1,748 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Good advice, and well done for dodging the bullet.
    Spriggan wrote: »
    take into account the risks that may come with a ex-council property.
    Personally, I'd never again have the council as my freeholder. Whether the works are genuinely needed, or good value for money, appear not to be strong factors in decision making when spending a combination of public funds and leaseholders' money.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.