We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Private Buyer Situation - Need Some Advice
Tomby1
Posts: 228 Forumite
I have a quick question for you helpful MSErs.
We have just gone on the market with an Estate Agent (Thursday) but have been looking to sell for some time and have been discussing with neighbours. On Saturday, one of our neighbours popped over to discuss their sister coming to view the property as she was interested in buying. They may well make an offer today (Monday).
My question is:
Based on the below contract wording, where do we stand with going private and bypassing the EA?
We have just gone on the market with an Estate Agent (Thursday) but have been looking to sell for some time and have been discussing with neighbours. On Saturday, one of our neighbours popped over to discuss their sister coming to view the property as she was interested in buying. They may well make an offer today (Monday).
My question is:
Based on the below contract wording, where do we stand with going private and bypassing the EA?
Sole Agency
Our sole agency rate is X%, inclusive of
VAT (X% net of VAT).
You will be liable to pay remuneration to us, in addition
to any other costs or charges agreed, if at any time
unconditional contracts for the sale of the property are
exchanged with a purchaser introduced by us during the
period of our Sole Agency, or with whom we had
negotiations about the property during that period, or
with a purchaser introduced by another agent during that
period. This liability persists for six months from the date
this agreement ends.
Joint Sole Agency and Multiple Agency
Different rates of commission apply and will be agreed
prior to any change in Agency.
Notice of the Right to Cancel
The client has the right to cancel this instruction within
fourteen days of signing this agreement, unless the
agreement has been signed by and in the presence of
both parties at the Agent’s premises, in which case the
instruction will be legally binding from the time of signing
the agreement.
We cannot commence marketing until the end of this 14
day period, where applicable, unless confirmed by you
at the ‘Performance of the Contract’ section below.
When you become liable to pay
The fee becomes payable in the event that the Estate Agent introduces a purchaser, whether directly or
indirectly, who enters into a binding contract to purchase
the property. Introduction may be made by means of
sales particulars, the internet, newspaper or other
advertisements, sign board, letter or personal enquiry
through our office or any sub-agency. The fee payable to
the Estate Agent is inclusive of all local advertising
carried out at our discretion. There will be no additional
costs or charges unless they have been previously agreed
by yourselves, eg any form of national advertising in any
format.
Our commission is due upon exchange of contracts and
payable from the proceeds of the sale by your solicitor or
conveyancer upon completion. Interest may be charged
on accounts not settled immediately upon completion.
Dual Fee Liability
Dual fee liability may arise where the client has previously
instructed another agent to sell the property, or where
the client instructs another agent to sell the property on
a sole agency basis or grants them sole selling rights
during or after the termination of this Agreement and
contracts are exchanged in a sale to a buyer to whom we
introduced the property.
Termination
Termination of the Agreement or a change of the type of
Agency can and shall be effected by 14 days written
notice by either party, subject to the agreed minimum
period of 12 weeks. The Agreement shall continue after
the initial minimum period unless and until terminated by
either party in the manner prescribed above.
If you wish to remove your property from the market you
may do so immediately. However, you may not thereafter
place it back on the market with any other estate agent
0
Comments
-
How did they know the property was for sale?0
-
IMO if the property is on right move then it would be hard to prove that it didn't come from the EA.
It would seem odd that they have only shown an interest as soon as an EA was instructed and property advertised0 -
babyblade41 wrote: »IMO if the property is on right move then it would be hard to prove that it didn't come from the EA.
It would seem odd that they have only shown an interest as soon as an EA was instructed and property advertised
They were away until Saturday visiting family in London, so were discussing it with them this week, but I can certainly see how the EA would view it (as you have).0 -
Is there a board outside? Is it listed online?0
-
It doesn't matter. Once you have instructed an estate agent to sell your house you are contracted to pay their fee even if the next door neighbour has decided to buy it and doesn't go through the estate agent.
If the person coming to view had arrived before you had a contract with the estate agent then you could have a case but not after.
The estate agent contract says that they have sole agency.0 -
It doesn't matter. Once you have instructed an estate agent to sell your house you are contracted to pay their fee even if the next door neighbour has decided to buy it and doesn't go through the estate agent.
If the person coming to view had arrived before you had a contract with the estate agent then you could have a case but not after.
The estate agent contract says that they have sole agency.
I thought there was a difference between sole agency and sole selling rights?
And yes to the online/board question.0 -
I thought there was a difference between sole agency and sole selling rights?
And yes to the online/board question.
The problem is that you can't prove that the buyer was not influenced by the advertising on Rightmove. They could have got the information orignally from you but they could also have looked at the property on Rightmove as well or someone else in their family could have looked at it on Rightmove and then discussed it with them. There is no way that you can prove that the advertising by your agent was not involved. If this had happened before you instructed an agent then it would be a private sale but not now.0 -
If you knew this, you should have given the EA prior warning and stated who they are before going live on the internet.They were away until Saturday visiting family in London, so were discussing it with them this week.
Of course, you may not have known and it might have been something they kept to themselves, in which case they've done you and their sister no favours!0 -
Following a case at the Court of Appeal, the Property Ombudsman has updated their Code of Practice, to define an "Effective Introduction"18j Effective Introduction. An effective introduction must evidence that the agent carried out an act that initiated the buyer’s reaction to the property. As such, there is a need for a defined transaction event to occur. This can be most clearly evidenced by an agent carrying out a viewing.
Link: https://www.tpos.co.uk/images/Codes_2019_a5/TPOE27-8_Code_of_Practice_for_Residential_Estate_Agents_A5_-_Effective_1_June_2019.pdf
On that basis, seeing an EA's board or an EA's advert isn't an Effective Introduction. The EA needs to do something like arrange a viewing.
If the EA is a member of the Property Ombudsman Scheme (most are), the Code of Practice is mandatory, so the EA should be updating their terms of business.
Edit to add...
The court case and update to the code of practice was mainly intended to stop sellers having to pay 2 fees to 2 different EAs, but it seems equally relevant in this case.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
