We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Fund of Funds = double the charges?

Does anyone know if you pay charges on the funds held within the fund?
For example LifeStrategy 100, the fund charge is 0.22%

The fund holds many Vanguard funds, eg US equity index which has a charge of 0.10%

Therefore, would you pay 0.22% + 0.10%? Or just the 0.22 for the "parent" fund?
«1

Comments

  • coyrls
    coyrls Posts: 2,518 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Just the 0.22.
  • Albermarle
    Albermarle Posts: 29,002 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Name Dropper
    Although terminology in this area can be fluid, normally a ' fund of funds' refers to a managed/active fund containing other managed/active funds .
    These are expensive as there are two layers of active fund management charges.
  • The 0.22 accounts for any charges of the underlying funds, hence why it's double.
  • Albermarle wrote: »
    Although terminology in this area can be fluid, normally a ' fund of funds' refers to a managed/active fund containing other managed/active funds .
    These are expensive as there are two layers of active fund management charges.

    Isn't the LS100 a fund of funds?
  • SonOf
    SonOf Posts: 2,631 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary
    edited 21 October 2019 at 12:52PM
    As mentioned above, you are not paying the full charge of the underlying funds in addition to the OCF of the fund of funds. However, there are increased costs but these are reflected in both the transaction charge column and the OCF column.

    So, in the case of VLS100, the charges are 0.22% OCF and 0.03% Transaction charges (total 0.25%). Fund of funds tend to have higher transaction charges but as VLS100 is fettered rather than unfettered, its only about 0.01% more for administration whilst the OCF is increased to allow vanguard to build in their margin and cover the cost of the underlying funds.
  • bostonerimus
    bostonerimus Posts: 5,617 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Isn't the LS100 a fund of funds?

    In general terms yes it is; it's a single fund that is made up of other funds and so when you buy it you have a ready made portfolio. You will see the fees on any fact sheet and they will be higher than many of the underlying funds as you are paying for the administration of the portfolio of funds and those fund charges are baked into the fee you see. Such funds run the spectrum from being unfettered ie they can buy funds from any company and manager and also change be actively managed to something like VLS100 that is fettered as it only contains Vanguard funds.
    “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
  • ColdIron
    ColdIron Posts: 10,021 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Hung up my suit! Name Dropper
    Does anyone know if you pay charges on the funds held within the fund?
    For example LifeStrategy 100, the fund charge is 0.22%

    The fund holds many Vanguard funds, eg US equity index which has a charge of 0.10%

    Therefore, would you pay 0.22% + 0.10%? Or just the 0.22 for the "parent" fund?
    Haven't we been round this loop before? See your post #17 in your thread below and my (and others) replies to your question e.g. my Waitrose analogy

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6052297/how-many-funds-in-a-portfolio
  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    ColdIron wrote: »
    Haven't we been round this loop before? See your post #17 in your thread below and my (and others) replies to your question e.g. my Waitrose analogy

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6052297/how-many-funds-in-a-portfolio
    Yes, I thought I had answered the question recently, my post #24 in that thread after OP had said "it's not clear, but you are probably right".

    It is clear, because there are industry-standard disclosure requirements which OEIC funds adopt and will tell you in their prospectus or other marketing material how they are doing it (especially if they are doing it a different special way).
  • I still think this is confusing sorry.

    For example HSBC Global Strategy (adventurous) holds Ishares SP500.

    From what I can see, the factsheet nor Key Information Document state anything about the charges on this fund within the fund. It is confusing and lacks clarity.
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    I still think this is confusing sorry.

    For example HSBC Global Strategy (adventurous) holds Ishares SP500.

    From what I can see, the factsheet nor Key Information Document state anything about the charges on this fund within the fund. It is confusing and lacks clarity.

    But you don't need to know what the underlying funds cost, it's all calculated and shown in the overall fund cost.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.