We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Previous years claims. changed goalposts again!

minislim
Posts: 357 Forumite


has anyone else noticed that comparison websites and some insurers have yet again changed the goalposts again on claims history.
so two years ago they asked for history for the last 3 years.
then last year it was 4 years.
now its 5 years!
so year on year i think its going to be scrubbed off and i still have to declare it! :mad:
so two years ago they asked for history for the last 3 years.
then last year it was 4 years.
now its 5 years!
so year on year i think its going to be scrubbed off and i still have to declare it! :mad:
0
Comments
-
Different insurers have always asked for different amounts of claims history - from memory Direct Line, Admiral and Hastings ask for 3. 5 has always been more usual.
Most price comparison sites will ask for 5 years as at least some of the insurers on their panel will want 5 years. The insurers who don't normally ask for that long won't do anything with the data they get on older claims. However if you really don't want to mention it at all try going direct to the websites of the insurers I mentioned (you will have to go direct to DL in any event as they're not on comparison sites)0 -
Assuming this is home or car insurance; most markets (insurers, brokers, comparison websites) ask about claims history for 5 years.
Any markets that didn't would be invariably selected against and pick up clients with claims in year years 4 + 5 history.
These clients have a higher propensity to claim, and would be getting artificially cheap premiums for the risk they presented on the basis they weren't having the claims taken into consideration via this market vs elsewhere.
Insurers would then lose money on this profile of client from that market, and pressure the broker/aggregator to amend the question set so they would fall in line with others.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards