We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House value for probate with Deed of Trust

I am one of two executors of my mother’s estate. We are selling her house.
When my mother bought the house she did so with the aid of my brother. She paid half and he paid half. My mother had the benefit of the house rent free. My mother then had a Deed of Trust drawn up to ensure that when the house was sold that half of the proceeds went to my brother.
My understanding of this situation is that my mother is the sole owner of the house. When I come to do the estate valuation I therefore must include the whole value of the house, £200,000 and not half of the value. Is this correct?
Thank you for any assistance.
«1

Comments

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Did the deed include the right to live in the place for life rent free?
    Was the deed done at purchase time or later?

    Legal and beneficial interests need determining to establish the IHT and CGT positions

    When the place was bought may be relevant with the tax rules changes over the years.

    Even if there is no IHT, there may be a CGT issue if it was not done properly.
  • Hi
    Thanks for the reply. The Deed of Trust was done after the purchase. My mother wrote that my brother had a half share of the house in a will. When she rewrote her will the solicitor said that it would be best if there was a Deed of Trust for my brother to save any confusion. I think it was also done to resolve any CGT issues that might have risen.
    My mother had the benefit of the house, rent free, until her death and this was stipulated in the Deed of Trust.
    Cheers
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    What year was that deed done?
  • Hi
    The property was bought in 1989 and the Deed of Trust was signed in 1995.
    Cheers
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,752 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    How is the property registered at the Land Registry?

    Is your late mother shown as sole proprietor?
  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    Sounds like your mother may be the sole legal owner but only have a 50% beneficial interest so £100,000.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    crabbit65 wrote: »
    Hi
    The property was bought in 1989 and the Deed of Trust was signed in 1995.
    Cheers

    That was before 2006 when changes were made to how properties with life interest were treated for tax purposes.

    Get proper legal and tax advise that applies to that time period.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,752 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Is there any Form A or B restriction on the Register?
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    The legal title is not relevant to the beneficial interest that determines the tax situation.
  • Hi
    In the 1989 Land Registry Plan Under B.Proprietorship Register there is a restriction by which no dispostion by the proprietor of the land is to be registered without the consent of my brother.
    The 21-3-1995 Deed of Trust states that the registered proprietor and my brother have agreed that the Property shall as from today be held by them in equal shares. Which I think means that my mother is the 'Registered Proprietor', ie 'Sole Proprietor' my brother has an equitable interest.

    I am assuming, which may be a mistake, that 'Registered Proprietor' and 'Sole Proprietor' mean the same thing.

    So, at the moment I am leaning towards putting down £200,000 as the 'Registered Proprietor' and then allocate accordingly, with my brother getting his equitable share before anything else is done.
    Does that make sense?
    Cheers for the help
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.