We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Subsidence & Insurance (leashold)
Comments
-
Thank you. Since it’s been 20 years since the remedial work was performed, I feel that maybe the “hit” would not be as painful as it could be if the underpinning was done a year ago.
May i ask you what kind of hit you took? Also were you aware of these issues before buying?
The problem is that such remedial work will always have to be divulged to any potential buyer & no matter how long ago it was, some potential buyers will be frightend off. A lowering of market price is often the only way to achieve a sale.
Yes I did know of the remedial work beforehand. I'd made my offer to buy after the price was reduced & it was then that the structural works that were done were revealed to me.
For me I was downsizing & didn't want to lose the flat I desperately wanted to buy, so accepting a lower price wasn't the financial disaster it might have been. I accepted an offer of approx 10% less than comparible properties were actually achieving & had been upfront with my buyer regarding the history of the house & gave her copies of all the documentation relating to it so she could be fully informed.The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.
I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.0 -
Thank you. 10% seems the standard but I am convinced that the current owner will not accept that kind of revised offer ( a 10% hit on a 200k house isn’t as painful as a 10% hit on a 900k property)...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards