PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

🗳️ ELECTION 2024: THE MSE LEADERS' DEBATE Got a burning question you want us to ask the party leaders ahead of the general election? Submit your suggestions via this form or post them on our dedicated Forum board where you can see and upvote other users' questions. Please note that the Forum's rules on avoiding general political discussion still apply across all boards.

Subsidence & Insurance (leashold)

Options
2»

Comments

  • cattie
    cattie Posts: 8,841 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Anniversary First Post
    Options
    Grut wrote: »
    Thank you. Since it’s been 20 years since the remedial work was performed, I feel that maybe the “hit” would not be as painful as it could be if the underpinning was done a year ago.

    May i ask you what kind of hit you took? Also were you aware of these issues before buying?

    The problem is that such remedial work will always have to be divulged to any potential buyer & no matter how long ago it was, some potential buyers will be frightend off. A lowering of market price is often the only way to achieve a sale.

    Yes I did know of the remedial work beforehand. I'd made my offer to buy after the price was reduced & it was then that the structural works that were done were revealed to me.

    For me I was downsizing & didn't want to lose the flat I desperately wanted to buy, so accepting a lower price wasn't the financial disaster it might have been. I accepted an offer of approx 10% less than comparible properties were actually achieving & had been upfront with my buyer regarding the history of the house & gave her copies of all the documentation relating to it so she could be fully informed.
    The bigger the bargain, the better I feel.

    I should mention that there's only one of me, don't confuse me with others of the same name.
  • Grut
    Grut Posts: 6 Forumite
    Options
    Thank you. 10% seems the standard but I am convinced that the current owner will not accept that kind of revised offer ( a 10% hit on a 200k house isn’t as painful as a 10% hit on a 900k property)...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 7 Election 2024: The MSE Leaders' Debate
  • 343.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 450K Spending & Discounts
  • 236K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 609.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.4K Life & Family
  • 248.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards