PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! However well-intentioned, for the safety of other users we ask that you refrain from seeking or offering medical advice. This includes recommendations for medicines, procedures or over-the-counter remedies. Posts or threads found to be in breach of this rule will be removed.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

slow cooker + liquid

Options
Whenever I use the slow cooker for meat the liquid boils away so I need to add more over time. When I do a search about this I keep reading that liquid won't boil/evaporate away.

Am I cooking wrong? I always use the stew option over 3-4 hours.

I have a Tefal 10-1 multicooker.
Debt £7976 | Savings £350Aims: Buy first home 2026-8. £20k deposit

Comments

  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    The temperature must be too high or the lid not fitting properly. With a normal slow cooker the temp does not reach boiling point and, with the lid on, all the liquid produced by the meat will be retained.
  • Pollycat
    Pollycat Posts: 35,755 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Savvy Shopper!
    I find my slow cooker 'makes' liquid rather than boiling it away.
    But it's just a cheap bog standard slow cooker.
  • ariba10
    ariba10 Posts: 5,432 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ayupmeduck wrote: »
    Whenever I use the slow cooker for meat the liquid boils away so I need to add more over time. When I do a search about this I keep reading that liquid won't boil/evaporate away.

    Am I cooking wrong? I always use the stew option over 3-4 hours.

    I have a Tefal 10-1 multicooker.

    It’s not what I would call a Slowcooker.
    I used to be indecisive but now I am not sure.
  • Chapter24
    Chapter24 Posts: 44 Forumite
    ariba10 wrote: »
    It’s not what I would call a Slowcooker.

    I think that must be it, - a slowcooker retains the moisture. If anything you end up with too much liquid, not too little!
  • comeandgo
    comeandgo Posts: 5,930 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    As others have said, you are not slow cooking, you are just doing a slow boil so your fluid will evaporate. Try taking your temperature down and cook for 6 hours or so.
  • I found that ''modern' slow cookers operate at a higher temperature than my old trusty slow cooker. So I think that a 'multi-cooker' is likely to do that.

    2 ways around this:
    1. simply add more liquid, and this will be 'trial and error'.
    2. if you can do so safely (obviously food must be thoroughly cooked) use a timer to cook for less time. I have to do that with my new slow cooker - 4 hours is plenty to cook the meat through, and any longer does lead to too much evaporation. As mine doesn't have an integral timer, I use an old simple timer. It depends on your timetable whether you want to start cooking later, or finish earlier. I fins food keeps hot in a switched off slow cooker for at least an hour.

    All of us on here agree that slow cookers are a matter of experimentation, whatever the recipe books tell you!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.