CPMS - LETTER OF CLAIM RECEIVED UPDATE 2021 - FINAL WITNESS STATEMENT HELP

greengeko

Thanks @KeithP
Looks like the Notice of Allocation from Manchester CC is out of date as it clearly states what I have put to be the statement of truth!
Will update as per CPR Part 22 like you said.

Fruitcake

If/when you have the scammer's WS. please post it here for the regulars to look over. Hopefully you will get theirs and can then comment on it before you need to submit yours, but don't be surprised if it doesn't arrive until about five minutes before the filing deadline.
Only redact YOUR personal data, and tell us if the scammers have redacted anything.
It may be horrendously long, so upload it to Dropbox or similar and post the link here. Make sure the account is not in your real name, and doesn't contain any personal images. Believe me, it has happened.

D_P_Dance

24 needs to be revised, 

https://hallellis.co.uk/statements-of-truth-templates/

Coupon-mad

Yes, I'd noticed before that HMCS' standard letters still tell people to use the old statement of truth.  Never mind, we tell people to get it right.

greengeko

Thanks all for your input - will upload the the Claimants documents if I receive them in time (I have to get everything across by the 9th April and I highly suspect they will delay as long as possible). It also seems they have still yet to pay the £25 trial fee.

Out of interest is the Judge that is named on the Notice of Allocation going to be the Judge that hears the case? The judge that is named is a family and matrimonial law solicitor so I'm a tad nervous that the case will go the same way as it did in the stickies example witness statement!

bargepole

greengeko said:

Out of interest is the Judge that is named on the Notice of Allocation going to be the Judge that hears the case? The judge that is named is a family and matrimonial law solicitor so I'm a tad nervous that the case will go the same way as it did in the stickies example witness statement!

It may be, or it may not.

When the papers arrive at the local Court, the first available Judge deals with the Notice of Allocation.

Months later, when a Trial Date is set, the case will be assigned to one of the Judges scheduled to be sitting on that date, so more likely than not that a different Judge will hear the case.

Redx

Cpms lost this one , Judge Iyer on the case , I strongly suggest that you read it , especially the judgment !!

greengeko

Hi all,

I have received BW Legals witness statement (currently digesting it myself).

For some reason I can't attach the PDF to this post (?file format not allowed?) but please see the below google drive link

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_ym_TPU7uaeesGkIHlF3UGBvLWJixd8J/view?usp=sharing

I have until the 9th (Friday) to get my WS sent over to the court and BW Legal.

Would really appreciate any input!

Will update with my points as I come to them.

@Redx - is there supposed to be a link judgement on your post?

greengeko

One point I have so far about valid of contracts etc. is that the free holder of the land (I have just check the land registry) is not 'complete property management solutions' as stated on the agreement to manage the car park (page 24) but is 'FREEHOLD MANAGERS (NOMINEES) LIMITED'

Does this invalidate the agreement or at least require further proof that complete property management solutions have been authorised to make this agreement?

Umkomaas

That landowner 'contract' is an utter joke!  The landowner 'signature' is a word processed facsimile in some font that looks like 'double writing'. There is no authority for CPMS to pursue the case to court either. Just a joke. 

While neither makes the claim instantly invalid, you must bring it to the Judge's attention in your own WS. 

Who has been using the black felt tip to redact parts of the WS?