We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Prosecution?
My daughter (14) has been hit by a car in a pedestrian crossing. Broken arm , hopefully no other major injuries although it is not clear . The policeman who dealt with it has been asking what I think re prosecution and I have no idea. I do not want to cause grief to the driver- I am sure they already been tormented enough and it may happen to anyone i reckon if unlucky - cars are dangerous items. But I have no idea of implications of having criminal prosecution or not happening - I will phone a personal injury solicitor but wanted to hear opinions of not interested parties as I am aware interests of a solicitor may not exactly align with ours ..
The word "dilemma" comes from Greek where "di" means two and "lemma" means premise. Refers usually to difficult choice between two undesirable options.
Often people seem to use this word mistakenly where "quandary" would fit better.
Often people seem to use this word mistakenly where "quandary" would fit better.
0
Comments
-
It is an offense to drive on a pedestrian crossing when a pedestrian is on it, which I assume is what occurred here. So the police will prosecute that if they have enough evidence.0
-
Whether an offence has been committed depends on exact circumstances.
For example on a zebra crossing, pedestrians only have precedence if they are on the carriageway within the limits of the crossing before any part of a vehicle has entered those limits.
OP, you seem awfully forgiving of the driver so what were the circumstances?You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
If you intend making a claim for damages, it will be much easier to prove your case if the driver is prosecuted."A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
The guy did not see them as they were on a central island just stepping on the road and they did not see him as they did not look because they were talking. I myself was in disbelief first how can one not see a pedestrian in front of them in a broad daylight but I understand if they are on a pavement in a motion of stepping in the brain may not register them as something relevant if one did not register there is a crossing. Re forgiving - I know he did not want to do it; I know we are all at risk in happening in his position- momentous lapse of concentration is all it takes.The word "dilemma" comes from Greek where "di" means two and "lemma" means premise. Refers usually to difficult choice between two undesirable options.
Often people seem to use this word mistakenly where "quandary" would fit better.0 -
-
OP I think you may want to consider deleting your post and giving no further details. If a prosecution is pending then your posts could jeopardise that.
If you feel the driver was wrong then push the Police to prosecute. But be entirely honest.0 -
My daughter (14) has been hit by a car in a pedestrian crossing. Broken arm , hopefully no other major injuries although it is not clear . The policeman who dealt with it has been asking what I think re prosecution and I have no idea. I do not want to cause grief to the driver- I am sure they already been tormented enough and it may happen to anyone i reckon if unlucky - cars are dangerous items. But I have no idea of implications of having criminal prosecution or not happening - I will phone a personal injury solicitor but wanted to hear opinions of not interested parties as I am aware interests of a solicitor may not exactly align with ours ..
IMHO, if the driver was truly remorseful, he would have already made contact to find out the extent of her injuries and express his regret for the pain and suffering he has caused."A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
The guy did not see them as they were on a central island just stepping on the road and they did not see him as they did not look because they were talking. I myself was in disbelief first how can one not see a pedestrian in front of them in a broad daylight but I understand if they are on a pavement in a motion of stepping in the brain may not register them as something relevant if one did not register there is a crossing. Re forgiving - I know he did not want to do it; I know we are all at risk in happening in his position- momentous lapse of concentration is all it takes.
That could be an issue, many pedestrians don't understand that a zebra crossing with a central island is in fact two separate crossings (Rule 20 of the Highway Code) and they need to ensure that traffic is stopping/stopped before crossing the second carriageway.0 -
Can the injured party press charges for a road traffic offence? I know they can in the case of an assault or for theft etc. But can they in the case of careless driving etc. I have never heard of a case where the police do not want to prosecute a road accident but the injured party wants to press charges. I genuinely do not know. It could be just very unusual rather than impossible.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.1K Spending & Discounts
- 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards