We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Threats to UK pension savers

123457

Comments

  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Losing up to 50% of your company pension when your employer goes out of business !!

    Source bbc reporting PPF rules wrt Thomas cook.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    lisyloo wrote: »
    Losing up to 50% of your company pension when your employer goes out of business !!

    Source bbc reporting PPF rules wrt Thomas cook.
    "up to 50%" is a sensationalist headline, 50% would only apply to the very highly paid. The vast majority will get at least 90%. Although possibly with worse indexation.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    zagfles wrote: »
    "up to 50%" is a sensationalist headline, 50% would only apply to the very highly paid. The vast majority will get at least 90%. Although possibly with worse indexation.

    My first concern when losing my job was finding another one. Pensions aren't normally the first task on the agenda.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,094 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    zagfles wrote: »
    "up to 50%" is a sensationalist headline, 50% would only apply to the very highly paid. The vast majority will get at least 90%. Although possibly with worse indexation.

    That’s very good know.
    I must admit I was shocked to read that.
  • Mick70
    Mick70 Posts: 751 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    political threats ? i.e if a hard left wing govt (corbyn? ) decided to reduce the LTA allowance level down to say 750k (or increase the tax percentage ?)
    stock market crash risks ?
  • Twopints
    Twopints Posts: 1,776 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Mick70 wrote: »
    political threats ? i.e if a hard left wing govt (corbyn? ) decided to reduce the LTA allowance level down to say 750k (or increase the tax percentage ?)
    stock market crash risks ?

    Is that the same LTA that was £1.8m in 2010? Since when it been reduced by a hard left wing govt to £1.055m.... Oh, wait, that can't be right

    :beer:
    Not even wrong
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    lisyloo wrote: »
    That’s very good know.
    I must admit I was shocked to read that.
    See https://www.ppf.co.uk/what-it-means-ppf

    The cap is about £40k at age 65, so way above the pension that most TC employees would be entitled to.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,548 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Twopints wrote: »
    Is that the same LTA that was £1.8m in 2010? Since when it been reduced by a hard left wing govt to £1.055m.... Oh, wait, that can't be right

    :beer:
    No it was reduced by them nasty Tories who like to help their rich mates...Oh wait - that can't be right either :beer:
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,258 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Labour are confiscating 10% straight off to hand to the 'workers' regardless of whether they are earning 100k or more. Then perhaps they will confiscate another 10% for NHS and so on.
    I think....
  • Mick70
    Mick70 Posts: 751 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Twopints wrote: »
    Is that the same LTA that was £1.8m in 2010? Since when it been reduced by a hard left wing govt to £1.055m.... Oh, wait, that can't be right

    :beer:
    Ha.. I had wrongly assumed labour must have brought it in as a means of taxing higher earners / savers . Bit of a strange one why the tories reduced the LTA
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.