We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Bromley Waitrose Double Dip
Comments
-
What is a 'holding thread'?
Why are you posting this stuff if it is not to solicit comments?
Would a blank piece of paper on your dining room table be just as effective for keeping notes?0 -
This is written from the named driver viewpoint. It's a holding thread and no need to comment.
Britannia reply to a SAR has turned up asking for £10. It's a template letter that says:
1. I cannot ask for the Landowner agreement (I didn't ask)
2. The contract is the sign at the car park which will be supplied at court. (I didn't ask for the sign)
3. I can have machine reports as long as it relates to my (as driver) transactions. We'll I've asked for the 4 pics related to the two trips to the car park and they appear not to have them. It's a double dip
4. Picture packs will be provided at court. This appears to conflict with #3 above as it is a combination of #2 and #3
Now as I am only asking for personal information, I should not need to pay the £10. If the continue to ask, it will be off to the ICO. I have also pointed out that if they do not provide the 4 pics for a double dip (machine reports from #3), it will be off to the ICO. The Keeper has asked for the 4 pics from the double dip and if not supplied, the Keeper is off to the ICO. And if they cancel, it won't stop the request going to the ICO for the 4 pics as it is my/keepers data and they shouldn't be so careless.
Looking forward to the ICO giving some sort of clarification on at what point the personal data of the Keeper (the pics) becomes the personal data of the named driver. A ruling on this also may have adverse effects on those not willing to reveal the name of the driver.Unlike some here, I am not omniscient. If I am wrong correct me. I won't take offence.
The law is like an ocean - have a swim but don't drown.0 -
Have you yet done the obvious thing, as already advised, and taken this back to Waitrose? Why are you making work for yourself?0
-
Just updating my account as the other one got lost in the change. Report coming later ... in about 4 months.
0 -
In about 4 months?1
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards