Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Right to buy tenant plan to cost LLs £50 Billion

12021232526

Comments

  • chucknorris
    chucknorris Posts: 10,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The-Joker wrote: »
    It’s too good to be true any of these perma property bulls saying they are happy to pay twice as much tax.

    So I am a perma property bull, really? Why am I selling then? Furthermore why was I posting in 2008 and 2009 that house prices were going to fall to a max of approx 35 to 40%. I am looking forward to your explanation!

    Here is the link to one of my 35% to 40% quotes:
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/20036927#Comment_20036927 7
    Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop
  • MobileSaver
    MobileSaver Posts: 4,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The-Joker wrote: »
    It’s too good to be true any of these perma property bulls saying they are happy to pay twice as much tax.

    You really, really do not understand how capital gains tax works do you? Every single landlord in the country would be happy to pay twice as much tax because it means they have made twice as much profit. (For the avoidance of doubt no-one would be happy to pay twice the tax rate but that isn't what was suggested.)
    Every generation blames the one before...
    Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years
  • Boris has only got as far as May did, it didn’t get through or her I don’t see why it will work for boris
    The thing about chaos is, it's fair.
  • Boris Johnson’s deal is a “trapdoor to no-deal” at the end of the transition period, as the Irish backstop has now gone.
  • Things are more uncertain and more unstable than ever before

    Anything could happen

    Why extend the uncertainty and instability even more? Crazy days
  • The-Joker
    The-Joker Posts: 718 Forumite
    Labour has been accused of trying to kill off the private rented sector after it resurrected its idea of extending Right to Buy to the private rented sector.

    Critics said it amounted to nothing less than the compulsory purchase of properties from private landlords. Others called it a ‘cash raid’ and theft. A poster on EYE yesterday asked people to switch off the light on their way out.

    Under the proposals, tenants would be able to buy properties from their landlords at a discount – with the pricing criteria set by the Government.

    https://propertyindustryeye.com/labour-under-fire-over-plans-to-introduce-right-to-buy-for-private-tenants/
    The thing about chaos is, it's fair.
  • MobileSaver
    MobileSaver Posts: 4,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The-Joker wrote: »
    Under the proposals, tenants would be able to buy properties from their landlords at a discount – with the pricing criteria set by the Government.

    And of course with the discount paid by the Government/taxpayer so that the landlord doesn't lose out; seems like a win/win for the tenant & landlord and a lose for the taxpayer to me.
    Every generation blames the one before...
    Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years
  • The-Joker
    The-Joker Posts: 718 Forumite
    And of course with the discount paid by the Government/taxpayer so that the landlord doesn't lose out; seems like a win/win for the tenant & landlord and a lose for the taxpayer to me.

    All depends if the land lord is happy to be forced to sell, and if he is happy with the price he is forced to sell.

    Generally speaking if somebody is forced to do something and they have no choice then they are not too happy about it
    The thing about chaos is, it's fair.
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The discount in McDonnell's scheme is paid by the landlord. Corbyn's Labour aren't going to give a bung to landlords from taxpayers.
  • MobileSaver
    MobileSaver Posts: 4,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Malthusian wrote: »
    Corbyn's Labour aren't going to give a bung to landlords from taxpayers.

    I'm afraid that was exactly what Labour originally proposed to do; they were going to withdraw a tax allowance from landlords and use that to cover the discount so that landlords still got the full amount.

    Unfortunately for Corbyn, the Conservatives got there first and have already reduced the tax allowances so the original plan simply won't work any more. Of course Labour have gone very quiet now on an alternative method of funding the discount.
    Every generation blames the one before...
    Mike + The Mechanics - The Living Years
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.