We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Incredibly stupid TV blunders on DOW value
                
                    wombat42_2                
                
                    Posts: 1,312 Forumite                
            
                        
            
                    Yesterday the DOW was closed because of Thanksgiving Day. The DOW was down 211.10 on the previous day. But bizarely Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight BBC2 still presented it as a change that took place yesterday. He said "the FTSE is up 80 points but the DOW is down 211 because of further credit crunch worries" !!!! The same mistake was made on Radio 4 news !!!                
                0        
            Comments
- 
            Maybe a junior member of staff compiled the report - it's therefore his/her fault!!0
 - 
            I think this error happens every time the DOW is closed for the day. I remember it happening previously. Also odd that Jeremy Paxman didnt realise the error.0
 - 
            Arguably correct information though, as the DJIA was down 211 in the most recent day's trading. They may have already mentionned Thanksgiving earlier in the programme so didn't feel the need to repeat that fact.
To be pedantic, it's the NYSE that was closed, the DJIA is an index...0 - 
            Yeah, it seems to happen every time the American market is closed. Shows how little attention the presenters/researchers really pay to the markets. On the other hand, it was a mistake...and it was Gavin Esler yesterday
                        BLOODBATH IN THE EVENING THEN? :shocked: OR PERHAPS THE AFTERNOON? OR THE MORNING? OH, FORGET THIS MALARKEY!
THE KILLERS :cool:
THE PUNISHER :dance: MATURE CHEDDAR ADDICT:cool:0 - 
            I think the biggest thing you should be worried about is that it closed on Wednesday below 12,850 and if it closes below there again it could mean big trouble technically.'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0
 - 
            You would expect Jeremy Paxman etc to be a clued up geezer - I mean its his job to be clued up.
I remember ITV making the same mistake once as well.0 - 
            Not 'arguably correct', PBA, as he starts off with "Today's markets" or similar, and it wasn't; and in any event he'd already reported that fall the previous night!
He does this nearly every time there's a US hol, he glosses over the market reports so briefly, it's hardly worthwhile having that section in the programme. He obviously has no idea of stock markets, whatever his other knowledge, and doesn't seem to give a toss about the figures.
Obviously someone else puts up the graphics and the figures, but I would have expected Paxman to have picked up on it before now.0 - 
            biased-bbc say Radio 4 did the same thing. :doh:
To be even more pedantic the DJIA is not an index and components include those traded on the Nasdaq, also closed.To be pedantic, it's the NYSE that was closed, the DJIA is an index...
                        "The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else." -- Frederic Bastiat, 1848.0 - 
            I have just emailed Newsnight. Theoretically someone might have made a critically important investment decision based on this false information and the BBC may theoretically be sued for any losses. If you think about it, it is appaling as it is completely incorrect info. Maybe I will email points of view as well.0
 - 
            
I have done that in the past, with no response. But maybe this time they'll work out what we're on about....I have just emailed Newsnight. Theoretically someone might have made a critically important investment decision based on this false information and the BBC may theoretically be sued for any losses. If you think about it, it is appaling as it is completely incorrect info. Maybe I will email points of view as well.0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
 - 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
 - 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
 - 454.3K Spending & Discounts
 - 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
 - 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
 - 177.5K Life & Family
 - 259.1K Travel & Transport
 - 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
 - 16K Discuss & Feedback
 - 37.7K Read-Only Boards