We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

DPA claim (after court win) POFA

I have won several cases against PPCs thanks to this forum, and as a result have the following follow up question related to one of my cases.

Several years ago I won in court, against a prolific PPC who uses the services of Gladstones solicitors based in their golf club.

The 'cause' of the claim was vehicle had 'overstayed' in a residential car park. A windscreen ticket was issued. A NtK was then sent.

The NtK was non-complant, and this was the basis of my win in court. The photographs used in the NtK were taken at the same time (seconds apart) and therefore did not show a duration of parking. Therefore, NtK non-compliant, case dismissed.

On this basis, I believe that the PPC processed and indeed requested my keeper details from the DVLA without proper reason. The photos provided did not evidence any duration of parking. So at the stage that I received a non-compliant NtK, the PPC was processing and had obtained my data (address/name) without proper basis.

Is this enough to pursue a claim against the PPC? I have several years to launch this, as I am almost half way through the 6 years allowable to bring a claim.

Thank you, any views welcome

Comments

  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    edited 31 August 2019 at 12:44PM
    This might be difficult. The PPC can lawfully request RK details from the DVLA to enquire identity of the driver.

    If this is not forthcoming, whether they can claim a breach of contract against the RK is up to a judge. How precisely do you think the PPC has breached your DP rights?
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • I believe they have breached my rights because they have requested and then obtained my name and address without justifiable/reasonable cause - the ticket should not have been issued and the paperwork (NtK) in association was non-compliant.
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    Whether a ticket has been properly issued or not is surely a matter for a judge. IMO they had reasonable cause.
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.