We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Extended Party wall extension with overhanging soffitt

Options
135

Comments

  • Aylesbury_Duck
    Aylesbury_Duck Posts: 15,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I’m afraid I agree with the above. Precedent is irrelevant if your neighbour objects. If you can persuade them to ignore it you might get away with it until they or you move and it crops up in a survey. If it does, you may have to put it right or pay something at that point. If they persist, you have two choices: pay whatever ransom they demand to make the problem go away or correct the roof. If the former, I’d advise seeking legal advice to see if it can be done in such a way as to not be a problem in future.
  • Jonah01
    Jonah01 Posts: 268 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    Our neighbours were good enough to not complain about our extension during planning and they also let us scaffold across their garage roof.

    I made it crystal clear to the builder that there should be no overhang onto their property.

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/54Ff588Dp6UbmfhE8

    It does devalue their property as it will put off potential buyers and also restricts them from building up to the boundary.

    In reality architects, planning , building control etc don't care about these issues.

    Does the planning app show it overhanging?
  • I used to own a semi detached bungalow and the neighbour in the adjoining property was to put it bluntly, a total ar5e.... (Loud music all day and all night, loud screaming arguments with others living with him etc).
    One time whilst I was working away, he decided to put up a conservatory on the rear of his house and this came right up to the boundary fence.
    When I returned, I noticed that when opened, the two side windows he had on the conservatory came over the fence and into my garden and the downpipe from the guttering on the conservatory discharged water directly into my garden.

    I asked him to rectify these two things and he refused, (It's my house, I will do as I like"), so I got the local council involved.
    He had to replace both windows with non opening ones and spend a lot of money to have a soakaway put in his garden.

    If he had simply asked me about these things before going ahead and wasn't such a poor neighbour then I would probably have lived with them but as he simply assumed that he could do as he wished, I made sure that he couldn't.

    moneytorques, get the problem sorted now for two reasons.
    If your neighbour takes action then you will have to do it anyway and if there is a dispute with them, you will have to declare this if you are considering selling at any time in the future.
  • Jonah01 wrote: »
    Our neighbours were good enough to not complain about our extension during planning and they also let us scaffold across their garage roof.

    I made it crystal clear to the builder that there should be no overhang onto their property.

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/54Ff588Dp6UbmfhE8

    It does devalue their property as it will put off potential buyers and also restricts them from building up to the boundary.

    In reality architects, planning , building control etc don't care about these issues.

    Does the planning app show it overhanging?
    https://ibb.co/Wnw2PjB

    The above image does show the overhang on the plans which were not appealed, we have a Party wall agreement in place.
  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,075 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 2 September 2019 at 10:47AM
    https://ibb.co/Wnw2PjB

    The above image does show the overhang on the plans which were not appealed, we have a Party wall agreement in place.

    Speak to your party wall surveyor if you like. Someone's going to have to mediate if you're refusing to budge. You have one or were your neighbours just trying to be nice and didn't question you?

    It did not have to be built like that. It could and should have been designed with the gutter on your side - even a valley within your boundary against the party wall, discharging to the back.
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • Doozergirl wrote: »
    Speak to your party wall surveyor if you like. Someone's going to have to mediate if you're refusing to budge. You have one or were your neighbours just trying to be nice and didn't question you?

    It did not have to be built like that. It could and should have been designed with the gutter on your side - even a valley within your boundary against the party wall, discharging to the back.

    We have a common party wall surveyor acting for both parties, the neighbours are housing developers and initially came and spoke to us about the plans as they didn't understand why we wanted to build on a relatively new property, but following conversations said that they didn't want to object.
  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,075 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    What does the award say about it?
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • Have you had any further conversation with your neighbour? If so, what was the outcome?

    It doesn't matter that the plans show the error and weren't objected to at that point. It's still an error and still a trespass. As advised before, if your neighbours insist the overhang be removed, you have no choice unless you can come to some sort of legally drawn-up financial arrangement that suits both parties. If I were them, I'd be taking advice on what it might cost for you to retrospectively change your roof and using that to inform what the price would be to shut up and ignore it. e.g. £20k to reprofile the roof? £15k to permit the trespass, please, plus legal costs covered.
  • Doozergirl wrote: »
    What does the award say about it?

    The award clearly states it must be built as per the Planning Application and references the drawing number.

    The only relevant clause is
    "That nothing in this award shall be held as conferring, admitting or affecting any
    right to light or air or any other easement whatsoever."
  • The award clearly states it must be built as per the Planning Application and references the drawing number.

    The only relevant clause is
    "That nothing in this award shall be held as conferring, admitting or affecting any
    right to light or air or any other easement whatsoever."
    I think that's the key element. IANAL but I read that as confirmation that the award does not confer the rights to use the neighbour's property, which in this case is the airspace above it. It's there to protect against the sort of error that's occurred in your plans and to ensure that the error cannot override the neighbour's rights.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.