We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Paypal Credit - section 75 rights

I recently had an experience of buying stolen goods from ebay. I think all is getting sorted, and seller is refunding my, but it made me think about how to avoid this being a problem.

The solution i think i have come up with is to use paypal credit. My thinking is that paypal would then have section 75 obligations in case anything goes wrong with the purchase.


There is a lot of discussion around credit card's section 75 obligations not applying for purchases through Paypal. So i wanted to find a way around that.


Does anyone have any information on how this would work.

A particular question i had is whether it would also apply in the case of private seller who is not acting as a business?

Comments

  • PRAISETHESUN
    PRAISETHESUN Posts: 4,931 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Section 75 requires a clear "creditor-debtor-supplier" link, which is usually broken by using 3rd party payment processors such as PayPal. If your credit provider is PayPal however, then I would suspect that would be okay. Not quite sure how it works with private sellers, but I would assume you'd have to dispute with eBay prior to escalating it to a section 75 claim with PayPal.
  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,971 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    TBH. Section 75 would be your last post of call. As Ebay or Paypal should deal with it via their own protection schemes.

    You would need to check with PayPal is their PayPal credit offers S75 cover.
    Life in the slow lane
  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 20,971 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    The problem with S75 is it is years out of date. It was set up when credit was direct to the company providing the goods/funds.
    ie. A car loan/furniture etc.

    With the massive rise in the use of credit cards. The whole S75 needs to be reviewed, as it is not fit for purpose now. as well as not really what S75 was intended to cover.

    S75 covers breach of contract &/or misrepresentation.
    So if you make a payment via a 3rd party (paypal) you are contracting them to move your (card providers) money to the seller.
    So long as they do that they (3rd party) have completed the contract.

    It is amazing the number of people who try to claim S75 when it is them that have broken the contract by cancelling a order.
    Life in the slow lane
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.