Son's name on deeds

I'm not sure if this is the right place for this thread but I'll shortly be downsizing my home and a neighbour has told me to put my son's name on the house deeds in case I ever need to go into a home. She said that when her father in law died her mother in law was advised by her solicitor to put her children's names on 50% of the property and now the she's had to go into a home and they will have to sell the house, the 50% owed by the children will go straight to them and not towards the care home costs.

Is this right? Or is she getting confused?

Comments

  • Catswhiska
    Catswhiska Posts: 103 Forumite
    Would be seen as deprivation of assets. It would not work and be treated as if you still owned all the property
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,523 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You also need to consider that it would be your children's asset as well, potentially to be taken into account if they divorce or ever needs means tested benefits, if it is not their main home. If it is their main home at present it would rule them out of FTB status if they ever look to buy their own house.
    If it's something you're considering you need to go through all the implications, not just the Care home ones.
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Dox
    Dox Posts: 3,116 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Well meaning neighbour but not one who understands the implications - which are very far reaching, and not just in terms of possible avoidance of care home fees.
  • Brynsam
    Brynsam Posts: 3,643 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Deakin wrote: »
    I'm not sure if this is the right place for this thread but I'll shortly be downsizing my home and a neighbour has told me to put my son's name on the house deeds in case I ever need to go into a home. She said that when her father in law died her mother in law was advised by her solicitor to put her children's names on 50% of the property and now the she's had to go into a home and they will have to sell the house, the 50% owed by the children will go straight to them and not towards the care home costs.

    Is this right? Or is she getting confused?

    Is your neighbour a qualified legal/financial professional? Has she explained that your children would be hit for a huge capital gains tax bill when your new home is sold? That if they already own homes, the purchase of your new home will spark a punitive 'second homes' Stamp Duty bill? That if they don't already own homes, part-owning your new home will mean that if they then buy their own first home, they will pay punitive 'second homes' Stamp Duty? That part-owning your home will mean they are excluded from Help to Buy and other house purchase initiatives? That their share of your new home would be taken into account if they ever divorce?

    Lastly...would your children really want you to end your days in some sort of smelly council sink home because the funds to pay for a decent home have run out?
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    it would also mean a Big CGT bill for the children on sale.
  • ermine
    ermine Posts: 757 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic
    the 50% owed by the children will go straight to them and not towards the care home costs
    People and their flippin' greedy kids. Allow us as taxpayers who will be on the hook for your care home costs to put you in the cheapest dump we can get away with. After all, if your kids CBA to look after you with what is your money, why should the rest of us stump up?

    There's no money tree. Their gain is your, and ultimately our loss, should the worst happen. FWIW it's unlikely to happen to you.

    Take a look at the ONS figures Just over 3% of the population ends up in a care home by 85. Of those over 85 it's still less than one in five, and of course you have to get to be over 85 to end up with that 16% risk, which includes really really old people. You can look up the national life tables to see your odds of making 85 and over, it is not a step-change from 84 to 85 as the 16% risk includes people who are 100.
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Deakin wrote: »
    I'm not sure if this is the right place for this thread but I'll shortly be downsizing my home and a neighbour has told me to put my son's name on the house deeds in case I ever need to go into a home.

    Your neighbour would apparently be fine with your son chucking you into Overmydeadbody Grove so he can get a bigger inheritance. Might be for the best that you are moving away from her.
  • Brynsam wrote: »
    Lastly...would your children really want you to end your days in some sort of smelly council sink home because the funds to pay for a decent home have run out?


    That is an unfair sweeping generalisation, I work in a Council run care home and it is far from smelly and has dedicated staff who really look after the residents. :p
    Vonvonvon:happylove
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.