We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
POPLA Evidence Comments
DGG1999
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hi Guys,
Recently appealed a PCN that I'd received at a multistory because on the floor that I parked there were no machines available to pay, which I took photographic proof of.
There whole point is that there were, but they were probably on a different floor, they aren't disputing that the machines were out of order.
Any help with adding extra comments after their evidence is submitted?
"In the Appellants appeal to POPLA the Appellant states that on the date and time that the ticket was
issued, on the floor that their vehicle was parked on there were no available payment machines, they
took photographic evidence of this at the time in order to back up an appeal should a PCN be sent to
them, they submitted these pieces of evidence and was declined because Smart Parking’srecords show
that some machines were open on that day - despite their evidence suggesting otherwise, there were
various cars that had written notes on their dashboards to say the machines weren't working."
This is the most crucial paragraph in my opinion, the rest of it just seems to be quite a generic response.
It was my understanding that if a payment machine isn't clearing visible, then it can't be used to bite you sort of thing.
TIA!
Recently appealed a PCN that I'd received at a multistory because on the floor that I parked there were no machines available to pay, which I took photographic proof of.
There whole point is that there were, but they were probably on a different floor, they aren't disputing that the machines were out of order.
Any help with adding extra comments after their evidence is submitted?
"In the Appellants appeal to POPLA the Appellant states that on the date and time that the ticket was
issued, on the floor that their vehicle was parked on there were no available payment machines, they
took photographic evidence of this at the time in order to back up an appeal should a PCN be sent to
them, they submitted these pieces of evidence and was declined because Smart Parking’srecords show
that some machines were open on that day - despite their evidence suggesting otherwise, there were
various cars that had written notes on their dashboards to say the machines weren't working."
This is the most crucial paragraph in my opinion, the rest of it just seems to be quite a generic response.
It was my understanding that if a payment machine isn't clearing visible, then it can't be used to bite you sort of thing.
TIA!
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards