We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
conservatives planning to raise retirement age to 75
Comments
-
...and round we go in circles....
as was said in this or a similar thread a couple of days ago, average age is not going up, longevity has stabilised and in some parts of the union it has even turned back downwards a little.
I think you are misunderstanding the maths here. It is quite possible for average age to keep rising despite a falling life expectancy while the population bulge works its way up through the age profile.
People also misunderstand life expectancy - the quoted figures are normally life expectancy at birth - not at retiral age. Early deaths have a disproportionate statistical effect on the headline rate, so if we were really serious about increasing life expectancy we would be targeting males age 18-25 to stop them killing themselves and each other with knives, cars or drugs.0 -
pensionpawn wrote: »Me and my wife will start to receive, in quite a few years time, our SP within 6 months of each other. That's £17,500 tax free pa at today's rate which is way too much for me to disregard from our pension planning. If any government even try to erode / take that away after paying into the system for 35 years the ensuing sh1tstorm will make Brexit look like a minor disagreement between friends!
That's my point entirely. Anyone within about 20 years of State pension age would have their vote swayed if the government tried to alter their access age. This will get more and more of an issue the closer you are to that age.
Its much easier for the government to convince us that the current pension age is not affordable and that we should raise this for our children on the argument that they have much longer to plan for it.0 -
the quoted figures are normally life expectancy at birth - not at retiral age.
Normally, yes. But it needn't be so.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/bulletins/lifeexpectancyatbirthandatage65bylocalareasinenglandandwales/2015-11-04#national-life-expectancy-at-age-65
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/bulletins/nationallifetablesunitedkingdom/2014to2016#life-expectancy-at-older-ages
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/bulletins/nationallifetablesunitedkingdom/2015to2017#no-improvements-in-the-chances-of-surviving-to-older-ages
But I suppose it's either far too difficult, or far too inconvenient, to start referencing those, in preference to playing 'no true Scotsman.'Conjugating the verb 'to be":
-o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
