We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Recession Looming - so pay off mortgage instead of investing?

13

Comments

  • I've kinda mixed two different ideas on this thread so my apologies to everyone for not being clear enough between my pension savings and my non-pension savings.

    To answer some specific points:
    If it really is 20% down for the first 7 months of this year
    Sorry, it's down 20% over the last 12 months, not YTD. Over the 5 years I've been in it's up only 0.6% or something.
    it seems you are bouncing between a high risk loss making fund and low risk mortgage repayment
    I was happier to take more risk in my pension as it's a longer term bet, but since moving into freelancing and reconsidering everything I'm less willing to take risks with my non-pension savings.
    ”That fund is heavily affected by Brexit. Its a high risk fund and one designed to be invested in with only a small percentage of your portfolio (maybe no more than a 5-10%). Not something anyone should be going into with 100%. That would be very bad investing if you did that.
    Yeah, at the time I made my decision I was more bullish on the UK but I should have reevaluated more deeply before now. It's currently around 30% of my pension which I know is too much, so I'll need to rebalance shortly. I think we might be able to stop a No-Deal Brexit though and so I'm wondering if I should hold off rebalancing until we know? It seems that No-Deal is already priced in so cutting it now doesn't seem like the best option?

    I might come back with a new thread outlining my current position and thought process in more detail, as I appreciate I've really been clear on what my short and long term objectives really are

    Thanks everyone
  • kinger101
    kinger101 Posts: 6,661 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Sorry, it's down 20% over the last 12 months, not YTD. Over the 5 years I've been in it's up only 0.6% or something.

    Relative to the market, it's five-yearly performance is probably even worse than it's annual performance.

    You need to find another investment(s) ASAP.
    "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius
  • Yeah it's been an awful choice really. So much for pure active, eh?!

    I can't change a 5 year old decision though so I need to focus on what to do now. Would you exit immediately, rather than wait to see if no deal can be averted?
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,358 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    Yeah it's been an awful choice really. So much for pure active, eh?!

    I can't change a 5 year old decision though so I need to focus on what to do now. Would you exit immediately, rather than wait to see if no deal can be averted?


    Pure active requires you to be more careful about what you invest in, not less.


    I would exit immediately. It is the wrong fund for a significant part of any portfolio, waiting a few months wont change that. Your portfolio should be broadly invested across the world.



    In any case deal or no deal is not a major factor. If its a worse than expected no deal the £ will fall and your large company investments will go up as a short term one-off change. If it is a surprisingly good deal the £ will rise and your large company investments will fall, again as a short term one-off change. However much the same would happen if you were invested globally. For the long term Trunp and China is far more important.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 18 August 2019 at 4:56PM
    Its the ASI UK Equity Unconstrained Fund, so I knew it was gonna be a volatile ride, but the last 12 months have caused me reconsider my risk appetite


    So you've invested 100% in the UK? Why? ............. oh why oh why?
    Go global.


    EDIT: Just seen your other posts. Sell it at market open Monday.
  • OK and once I've sold out where do I put it?

    I've got around £215k in total in the pot so let's imagine I sell everything and start again - what would you guys suggest as a new portfolio?

    I'm 40 just now and so can't access it for 18 years: would you folks stick it all in a global equity tracker, or go 70% global equities, 20% EM and 10% bonds or something?

    Open to all ideas! (especially any lower risk ones that can easily achieve 4% each year after inflation ;) )

    Thanks again - really appreciate folk taking the time out to post here
  • This is an interesting thread as I’m in a very similar situation....wrestling between paying off the mortgage (170K) or paying a large chunk off..say 100K and then investing the 70K plus extra somewhere else. Part of me just wants the mortgage done but I know its not maybe the most financially sensible. I also don’t want to pay into pension as I may want to access it earlier than 55.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    OK and once I've sold out where do I put it?

    I've got around £215k in total in the pot so let's imagine I sell everything and start again - what would you guys suggest as a new portfolio?

    I'm 40 just now and so can't access it for 18 years: would you folks stick it all in a global equity tracker, or go 70% global equities, 20% EM and 10% bonds or something?

    Open to all ideas! (especially any lower risk ones that can easily achieve 4% each year after inflation ;) )

    Thanks again - really appreciate folk taking the time out to post here

    I would pick a global tracker 100% equities. Not VLS.
  • Zero_Sum
    Zero_Sum Posts: 1,567 Forumite
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    I would pick a global tracker 100% equities. Not VLS.

    Why not VLS100? Out of interest
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Zero_Sum wrote: »
    Why not VLS100? Out of interest


    Because VLS has a 25% "UK" weighting* which means its heavily bought into the top 20 FTSE companies which is very heavily weighted into oil banks & pharma. Not very diversified.

    And I dont think oil companies have a great future either.


    * (and the 25% is wholly "artificial, there's no rhyme or reason to it, the fact its such a round number shoudl be a clue to that. The theory is that Uk investors want a UK bias but i reckon first of all we have that anyway due to our jobs pension and house, and secondly its not really UK, these are massive multinationals)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.