We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

Tax tax free lump sump GAR pension?

Hi,

I have a pension pot worth £66,071 with a GAR of 8.17%. I am going to be 20% tax payer in retirement so I think this will give me £5398 before tax and £4319 after tax per year.

I have an option to take 25% tax free which would give me a lump sum of £16,519 and the 75% left in the pot would give me £4049 or £3238 after tax. That is £1081 less each year.

So I think it would take 15 years for the extra £1081 to catch up with the tax free lump sum.

I am thinking of not taking the tax free lump sum. I don't really have any other guaranteed income so it would be nice to some money on top of the state pension for the rest of my life. Am I thinking about this in the right way?

I am not sure if it makes any difference but I am 59 and have reasonably large DC pension pots.

Will

Comments

  • ffacoffipawb
    ffacoffipawb Posts: 3,593 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    will111222 wrote: »
    Hi,

    I have a pension pot worth £66,071 with a GAR of 8.17%. I am going to be 20% tax payer in retirement so I think this will give me £5398 before tax and £4319 after tax per year.

    I have an option to take 25% tax free which would give me a lump sum of £16,519 and the 75% left in the pot would give me £4049 or £3238 after tax. That is £1081 less each year.

    So I think it would take 15 years for the extra £1081 to catch up with the tax free lump sum.

    I am thinking of not taking the tax free lump sum. I don't really have any other guaranteed income so it would be nice to some money on top of the state pension for the rest of my life. Am I thinking about this in the right way?

    I am not sure if it makes any difference but I am 59 and have reasonably large DC pension pots.

    Will

    With a GAR like that I would take the full pension.
  • Terron
    Terron Posts: 846 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    With a GAR like that I would take the full pension.


    Even with that low a GAR I would take the full pension. (My GAR is 10.6% and I am taking it in full, despite having other guaranteed income.)
  • MEM62
    MEM62 Posts: 5,459 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I would be an easy decision for me. The question is, if you took the 25% TFLS, is there anywhere else you could put that money which would give you are return that is guaranteed and better than 8%. In the current climate the answer to that is no.

    I would therefore forget the lump sum and take the full pension.
  • ukpoker
    ukpoker Posts: 33 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    I too have a 10.6% GAR pension due in 2 years time.

    I've thought about this long and hard and have decided to take a 15% 'tax free' element rather than the 25%.

    I agree with all the posters that say that taking the full pension is appropriate because of the GAR but is also a consideration that the lump sum benefit, whatever the % taken, might be of use to start off your life as a pensioner.

    Also the state pension kicks in in a few years which will give me another 8k - 10k a year so I don't want to be a rich 'old' pensioner not having had any fun in my 60's :)
  • itwasntme001
    itwasntme001 Posts: 1,320 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    My dad had this, he took out the annuity just before it got withdrawn (before he turned 60 i think). 10% annuity on 125k pot. 50% to spouse on death as well. No inflation linkage unfortunately but given it seems like we are structurally long term low inflation/rates, its a no brainer to take it out at the high rate. I worry the provider will go bust as they surely can not afford it??
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 260K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.