We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
PCN already paid - any chance of claim for breach of contract
joelyp
Posts: 5 Forumite
This relates to my 79-year-old father, who received and paid a PCN in Wales (he did not mention it to me at the time - I would have advised him not to pay).
Car park run by One Parking Solution. He entered the small car park on Father's Day in a tourist trap, car park was completely full. Sat waiting for a space for 16 minutes with engine running but no spaces became available, so he drove off. He didn't appreciate the camera system and automation would yield a PCN.
The PCN arrived, and of course it had a huge picture of what appeared very similar to a speed camera on it, and what seemed to him to be rather official and threatening wording. So he paid by cheque.
Having spoken to me since, he is now wishing he had appealed rather than paid.
He did subsequently write to One Parking Solution asking for the fee to be refunded (giving his reasons), and they responded that the ticket had been correctly issued as he had "used the facility". It struck me as odd that One Parking Solution did not simply state that he had accepted the terms and paid and that was the end of it. Can it possibly be argued that their response amounted to entering into an appeal (albeit after having paid), and therefore that a POPLA code should be issued?
Citizen's Advice (yes, I know...) suggested taking action in small claims court on the basis of either breach of contract or there having been no contract (CAB was aware PCN had been paid), but given that the PCN has been paid, is there any mileage there?
I spoke briefly to POPLA in general terms (having no POPLA code), and they said that there was flexibility within Section 13 of BPA code to give more than the 10 minutes of grace period, in appropriate circumstances. I'd suggest that the information my father provided (particularly busy day) and nothing that the latest Google Maps picture of the car park shows it to be full with 2 cars waiting, should be sufficient to show his argument is reasonable.
Any advice greatly appreciated. I have read through the full Newbies advice, but could not find much for situations whereby the PCN had already been paid.
Car park run by One Parking Solution. He entered the small car park on Father's Day in a tourist trap, car park was completely full. Sat waiting for a space for 16 minutes with engine running but no spaces became available, so he drove off. He didn't appreciate the camera system and automation would yield a PCN.
The PCN arrived, and of course it had a huge picture of what appeared very similar to a speed camera on it, and what seemed to him to be rather official and threatening wording. So he paid by cheque.
Having spoken to me since, he is now wishing he had appealed rather than paid.
He did subsequently write to One Parking Solution asking for the fee to be refunded (giving his reasons), and they responded that the ticket had been correctly issued as he had "used the facility". It struck me as odd that One Parking Solution did not simply state that he had accepted the terms and paid and that was the end of it. Can it possibly be argued that their response amounted to entering into an appeal (albeit after having paid), and therefore that a POPLA code should be issued?
Citizen's Advice (yes, I know...) suggested taking action in small claims court on the basis of either breach of contract or there having been no contract (CAB was aware PCN had been paid), but given that the PCN has been paid, is there any mileage there?
I spoke briefly to POPLA in general terms (having no POPLA code), and they said that there was flexibility within Section 13 of BPA code to give more than the 10 minutes of grace period, in appropriate circumstances. I'd suggest that the information my father provided (particularly busy day) and nothing that the latest Google Maps picture of the car park shows it to be full with 2 cars waiting, should be sufficient to show his argument is reasonable.
Any advice greatly appreciated. I have read through the full Newbies advice, but could not find much for situations whereby the PCN had already been paid.
0
Comments
-
Chalk it up to experience and move on
Make sure that he now understands the ways ppcs operate0 -
i have a court case coming up registered by premier parks- i am one for fighting these unreasonable excessive charges that they dream up- they have got away with it for too long a time- a district Judge has just thrown out a case in southampton case no F0DP201T for ABUSE OF PROCESS- forget about BEAVIS on this one! parking companies love to threaten with Beavis who lost at the high court regarding overstays bla bla bla, take this to the small claims court and quote the case that judge Taylor threw out against BW legal- as this gains momentum it will snowball and take out the parking companies like a bowling ball-0
-
It is likely that there was no contract and I do not see why such a claim should not succeed. It would largely depend on how a judge feels about these companies conning the vulnerable, (and how vulnerable your father is), and the amount of threats/deceits employed by the scammer.
In my opinion it would not hurt to get your father's MP involved. as nine times out of ten these tickets are scams. This one certainly was.
Parliament is well aware of the MO of these private parking companies, and on 15th March 2019 a Bill was enacted to curb the excesses of these shysters. Codes of Practice are being drawn up, an independent appeals service will be set up, and access to the DVLA's date base more rigorously policed, persistent offenders denied access to the DVLA database and unable to operate.
Hopefully life will become impossible for the worst of these scammers, but until this is done you should still complain to your MP, citing the new legislation.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2019/8/contents/enacted
Just as the clampers were finally closed down, so hopefully will many of these Private Parking Companies. n.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards