We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
SVS Securities - shut down?
Options
Comments
-
eskbanker said:Sheris said:1
-
On Nov 22nd it will be four months since we should have had access to our portfolios and cash. How on earth can the FCA & LSE accept the fact that ITI are saying they can only do 20 transfers a month to each of these brokers? Can someone please explain exactly what ITI have to do in order to transfer a standard portfolio of let's say 10 securities? How can this be so difficult that they can only manage 20 per month to each broker? As a retired accountant/programmer I'm sure I could have written something within a month to do this. I have never in my 67 years of living come accross such an incompetent bunch of people. They have broken every rule in the book and yet both the FCA & LSE continue to allow them to operate! It's quite incredible.3
-
20 per week, not that that's much better1
-
shiznit76 said:eskbanker said:Sheris said:
Anyway, why would you ask a question on here if you believe that your wife knows the answer?1 -
shiznit76 said:20 per week, not that that's much better0
-
Michael_Reynolds said:How can this be so difficult ...?Because a lot of the transfers from SVS were in certificate form which isn't acceptable to the new brokers. ITI have to get the certificated shares changed to electronic before they can be transferred in the normal way.Also a lot of transfers involve non-listed and AIM shares with their corresponding problems.On top of these problems there are totally inadequate systems at ITI which are not fit for purpose.Leonard Curtis knew all this and took precautions by tightly wording the contract with ITI.ITI probably just wanted the large client base to make them look a credible player and the customers who want to get involved with more lucrative trading (i.e. more lucrative for ITI).For ITI the transfers are costly and unproductive so they don't want to pay enough staff to get them done in a timely manner. It is cheaper to pay compensation to those who complain enough to get it.At least that is my take on this. I'd say that ITI still have insufficient motivation to solve the difficulties.1
-
eskbanker said:shiznit76 said:eskbanker said:Sheris said:
Anyway, why would you ask a question on here if you believe that your wife knows the answer?0 -
0
-
shiznit76 said:eskbanker said:shiznit76 said:eskbanker said:Sheris said:
Anyway, why would you ask a question on here if you believe that your wife knows the answer?
Depending on FOS's opinion once they've heard both sides of the story, they may instruct ITI to increase that amount, or leave it as is, or even (theoretically!) decrease it....3 -
eskbanker, Do you think ITI will have a story to tell ?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards