We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

SVS Securities - shut down?

1387388390392393651

Comments

  • How many pages of complaints have we got now...well over 200!
  • Update on my wife's accounts received from ii today.


  • My2penneth
    My2penneth Posts: 807 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 18 September 2020 at 1:26PM
    The first hint of problems started at page 154.
    Pafpcg reported
    "And so the schedule for getting access begins to slide!"

    Here we are at Page 406!

  • Some Shout Outs:
    1   Geeba - you have a Trade and more importantly a SETTLEMENT DATE.  You are my hero. 

    Now we all know such a thing exists we can all ask our new brokers "When is my settlement date...what do mean you have not yet got one.  Why ever not?"; and
    2  Shawdon.  What I thought was interesting about the letter was the below:
    "I have not had a meaningful response to my email to ITI, other than an acknowledgement, promise to revert with a proper response and a request not to copy the FCA in!"

    Why ever not?  That request from ITI must of itself be a breach of the FCA rules - how is it being open, fairt and fran with the Regulator?
    PLUS why did ITI not want the letter copied?  Do they actually fear/are worried about the FCA?  Even more reason for each of us to tell the FCA of all the continuing defaults of ITI.
  • Some Shout Outs:
    1   Geeba - you have a Trade and more importantly a SETTLEMENT DATE.  You are my hero. 

    Now we all know such a thing exists we can all ask our new brokers "When is my settlement date...what do mean you have not yet got one.  Why ever not?"; and
    2  Shawdon.  What I thought was interesting about the letter was the below:
    "I have not had a meaningful response to my email to ITI, other than an acknowledgement, promise to revert with a proper response and a request not to copy the FCA in!"

    Why ever not?  That request from ITI must of itself be a breach of the FCA rules - how is it being open, fairt and fran with the Regulator?
    PLUS why did ITI not want the letter copied?  Do they actually fear/are worried about the FCA?  Even more reason for each of us to tell the FCA of all the continuing defaults of ITI.
    The only reason i can think of it they don't want the FCA to get a true picture of the extent of the problem .. lets be honest ..  FCA have been fast asleep during all of this. 
  • Agreed and we all need to wake them up
  • ITI is the most top-heavy organisation I have met...nobody who one actually speaks to actually makes or can make any decisions about anything r knows anything.  EVERYTHING has to be relayed to management, a director, my manager, my supervisor etc.  Nobody can make a decision.  As for the Director of Compliance, nice Mr David Moss, anybody knows what he actually does? [answering my complaints/queries/questions he doe snot do that I know for certain] . 
  • On my joint account, stocks/cash are in SC account and showing on the closure download form, I have managed to upload what were JPG 3MB file documents by converting them to pdf, this must have compressed them as they are now smaller at 970KB, closure submitted, hurrah, 3 cheers for sh ITI, NOT!
    .........................................................
    Now for the other two SC accounts which have nowt in them, cash/assets are all in the Phoenix accounts, the Closure download cash/assets form needs a signature, I'm not signing those. Going to put another complaint in to have the assets moved back to SC accounts. This really is tiresome.


  • SteveJohnson56
    SteveJohnson56 Posts: 61 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 August 2021 at 4:43PM
    [Edited by Forum Team]
    I have received exactly the same, but it does not refer to which complaint I made, I've made several.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.