📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SVS Securities - shut down?

Options
13435373940653

Comments

  • Reaper
    Reaper Posts: 7,354 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    pafpcg wrote: »
    Presumably, they're trying to keep their own telephone costs down by getting the victims to call them back
    No, to make high volumes of calls rather than have somebody at their end wait for you to answer a computer makes the call. If you don't answer none of their time has been wasted. If you do it tries to connect you with a member of staff. If none is available at the time it disconnects. Annoying but again no time lost at their end, just yours. Usually you just get silence or are disconnected, though in this case it was a recorded message.
    https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-telecoms-and-internet/advice-for-consumers/problems/tackling-nuisance-calls-and-messages/abandoned-and-silent-calls
  • gadgetmind
    gadgetmind Posts: 11,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Interesting that both email addresses and telephone numbers of SVS clients seem to have escaped to some scammers, presumably for someone somewhere getting a substantial kick back.
    I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.

    Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.
  • I got exactly the same phone call yesterday at 2.45 pm with the recorded message. Number is now blocked.
  • johnburman
    johnburman Posts: 727 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts
    All XO clients will be able to access the Web. Even so the outsourced helpline is still necessary. And a comfort.
  • I suspect they have been involved in some kind of fraud involving pension liberation schemes. I have several clients that were told to invest their pensions in worthless SVS unlisted stock in return for loans. This involved several companies that keep cropping up using 'execution only' instructions to cover themselves. A chap named Simon fox at SVS appears to be involved.
  • coyrls
    coyrls Posts: 2,508 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Probably a good idea to remove that name or you risk this whole thread being removed.
  • Hi Coming back to the phone calls. I understand it was a scam, my concern is that how this person manage get my telephone no and has information about my account with SVS. I thought the data protection act stoped this.
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 37,282 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    englishmas wrote: »
    Hi Coming back to the phone calls. I understand it was a scam, my concern is that how this person manage get my telephone no and has information about my account with SVS. I thought the data protection act stoped this.
    Only in the same way that the motorway speed limit stops everyone from driving at more than 70mph, i.e. it's one thing to outlaw something, it's an entirely different matter to enforce that....
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,308 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    englishmas wrote: »
    Hi Coming back to the phone calls. I understand it was a scam, my concern is that how this person manage get my telephone no and has information about my account with SVS. I thought the data protection act stoped this.
    Three possibilities:
    1) Undisclosed data breach that happened prior to the company being put in administration
    2) Rogue employee, unhappy with being made redundant, decided to supplement their redundancy pay
    3) Data was sold as just another dodgy action of the company (seems mild compared with the other things it is alleged to have done at the expense of its customers)
  • pafpcg
    pafpcg Posts: 930 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    masonic wrote: »
    Three possibilities:
    1) Undisclosed data breach that happened prior to the company being put in administration
    2) Rogue employee, unhappy with being made redundant, decided to supplement their redundancy pay
    3) Data was sold as just another dodgy action of the company (seems mild compared with the other things it is alleged to have done at the expense of its customers)
    Why have you excluded the possibility that the data breach occurred after the company went into administration?
    Further, the client data would be a valuable asset. After liquidation, the administrators would be expected to maximise recovery by selling any assets which have value.
    Time for the ICO to get involved?
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.