We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SVS Securities - shut down?

Options
1357358360362363653

Comments

  • My2penneth
    My2penneth Posts: 807 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 14 September 2020 at 11:33AM
    Just tried the 8001 number again. Incredible noise levels.

    I asked which account should I make sure is correct (Qort or Phoenix) before transferring assets. I was told "both" should be correct. 

    (sorry, don't wish to be accused of being racist but do any of the people at the call centre have English as their first language?)


  • UPDATE ON MY PROSPECTIVE COMPLAINT ABOUT LEONARD CURTIS TO THE INSOLVENCY SERVICE

    21. Will I receive any compensation if my complaint is upheld?

    No. The authorising body cannot award or compel an insolvency practitioner to pay you compensation for any financial loss you consider you may have suffered.  If you believe that you have suffered a financial loss as a result of negligence by an insolvency practitioner you should pursue your own legal remedies.

    Never mind, eh! I was only going to spend weeks formulating my complint case, gathering and providing evidence and dealing with enquries and responses from LC just for the fun of it. I have nothing better to do.




  • Contacted iWeb...they chased ITI for transfers on 3rd September. They chase every 10 days. hence they are sending out another chasing email today. 
  • Just tried the 8001 number again. Incredible noise levels.

    I asked which account should I make sure is correct (Qort or Phoenix) before transferring assets. I was told be correct. 

    (sorry, don't wish to be accused of being racist but do any of the people at the call centre have English as their first language?)


    See my earlier post today, email from LC. They say " it shouldn’t matter that some of your holdings have now started so appear in your Phoenix account with ITI rather than the “Qort” account your assets all initially appeared on when you first completed your onboarding with them.".  Which no doubt will change to i should matter
  • Josl
    Josl Posts: 80 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Contacted iWeb...they chased ITI for transfers on 3rd September. They chase every 10 days. hence they are sending out another chasing email today. 
    Barclays investments sent transfer-in requests on 11-Aug. Since then they have sent 3 requests all ignored by ITI Capital.
  • Josl
    Josl Posts: 80 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    I had thought that ITI were delaying transfers out of incompetence but i now wonder if it is because they have incorrect or inaccurate data on our shareholdings. Remember what went to them from LC was correct data... Our shareholdings were correct... But now could be corrupted or inaccurate. All a bit worrying. 
    The data is correct. Ambiguity is ITI friend. They have paid substantial amount of money to buy these client books from SVS. They want to make money from those assets and cash before releasing them back to investors. No doubt these assets are being traded on the LSE since ITI capital are on the nominee register as owners. No firm can be this incompetent to unable to sort issues out for two months.
  • Anybody thought of a no win no fee firm of solicitors for a class action against ITI?
  • Josl said:
    Legal action against LC via a city law firm [Under review]
    I would be very interested in joining the legal action if there is any chance of kicking LC into sorting this mess out.
    Maybe others can also register interest and we can see if there is a possibility of setting up a fighting fund?
  • Josl
    Josl Posts: 80 Forumite
    Second Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    Anybody thought of a no win no fee firm of solicitors for a class action against ITI?
    I am corresponding with an associate of a city law firm who is interested in pursuiing a class action law suit against the FCA. They think my request for review against LC for negligence may be difficult to prove since it is the FCA who approved appointment of ITI Capital but said they'll review if more evidence can be found against LC. They also think case against ITI capital is weak since all they are doing is not providing access.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.