We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Barclays PPI Claim

Hi
Could any help with the following please. Why did Barclays originally only look back on PPI claims to 2001 then re-opened cases (mine included) going back to 1996. Did they decided to do it themselves or were they forced to do it by the Financial Ombudsman Service (or some other financial body)?
Many thanks
Lana

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    They managed to recall some of the data from archive. They're required to provide any information they can.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    lana3111 wrote: »
    Why did Barclays originally only look back on PPI claims to 2001 then re-opened cases (mine included) going back to 1996.
    Barclays found information thought to be lost or irretrievable. They did the honest thing with this information and re-opened cases affected. They are, however, required to do this by the Regulator.
  • Hi

    that is great, many thanks.
  • SonOf
    SonOf Posts: 2,631 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary
    Why did Barclays originally only look back on PPI claims to 2001 then re-opened cases (mine included) going back to 1996. Did they decided to do it themselves or were they forced to do it by the Financial Ombudsman Service (or some other financial body)?

    Barclays were honourable and brought back information onto their systems that had long been archived into non-searchable storage. Something most other lenders have not done.

    The FOS did not force them to do that and does not have the powers to make them do that.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    SonOf wrote: »
    The FOS did not force them to do that and does not have the powers to make them do that.
    While this is true, once Barclays retrieved the information the regulator would certainly expect them to use it proactively. They could hardly keep it a secret..
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 240K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 616.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.3K Life & Family
  • 253.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.