We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Big DB Multiplier
ffacoffipawb
Posts: 3,593 Forumite
Asked one of my deferred pension providers for an early retirement quote. Pension is £9,200 approximately.
PCLS of £48,000 and reduced pension of £6,900 available instead.
Transfer value has been provided, wait for it ... £399,000 approximately.
That's a 42x multiplier.
Given I have just crystallised 70% LTA this would take me over LTA which I wouldn't do anyway.
However could get a pension of £16,000 from this transfer value assuming a 4% SWR.
This multiplier must be a record?
PCLS of £48,000 and reduced pension of £6,900 available instead.
Transfer value has been provided, wait for it ... £399,000 approximately.
That's a 42x multiplier.
Given I have just crystallised 70% LTA this would take me over LTA which I wouldn't do anyway.
However could get a pension of £16,000 from this transfer value assuming a 4% SWR.
This multiplier must be a record?
0
Comments
-
my only DB pension is offering 48x
£1875 pa or transfer value of £90,000.
The advice I would have to pay for (if I could find anyone to do it) would eat a big bite out of that so I haven't botheredI’m a Senior Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Pensions, Annuities & Retirement Planning, Loans
& Credit Cards boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com.
All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.0 -
Not a record but well at the upper end and far above the 30 or 32 times I might currently use before I know actual values.
Likely to have some combination of these to get that high:
1. high spousal benefit
2. scheme members with high life expectancy: office working professions rather than manual labourers
3. no or little GMP without inflation increases
4. RPI explicitly specified so CPI can't be substituted or maybe something more generous0 -
Not a record but well at the upper end and far above the 30 or 32 times I might currently use before I know actual values.
Likely to have some combination of these to get that high:
1. high spousal benefit
2. scheme members with high life expectancy: office working professions rather than manual labourers
3. no or little GMP without inflation increases
4. RPI explicitly specified so CPI can't be substituted or maybe something more generous
1 yes, spouse is £7,000 regardless of option taken
2 yes, boring office job
3 yes, GMP is about 15% of the total, 4.5% fixed rate revaluation
4 yes, RPI linkage in deferment and payment, GMP different obviously
Full house, lol
Seems strange that PCLS is only £48,000 whereas 25% of the transfer value is about £75,000. Seems inconsistent.0 -
Is it correct to calculate the multiplier from a pension that will be taken early and therefore reduced ?
I thought you had to base it on the projected pension at NRD ?, which would reduce the multiplier .
The CETV offered is the same whether you want to take it early or not .0 -
The PCLS at £48,000 is actually quite good if you did decide not to transfer. Going by your figures the commutation factor works out at 20.87, which means you are getting nearly £21 of lump sum for every £1 of pension given-up.ffacoffipawb wrote: »1 yes, spouse is £7,000 regardless of option taken
2 yes, boring office job
3 yes, GMP is about 15% of the total, 4.5% fixed rate revaluation
4 yes, RPI linkage in deferment and payment, GMP different obviously
Full house, lol
Seems strange that PCLS is only £48,000 whereas 25% of the transfer value is about £75,000. Seems inconsistent.
It is however a tempting transfer value, but I would think its safer considering it on a SWR of 3% rather than 4% as there is sequence of returns risk to consider, especially if we have a poor first decade of returns.0 -
Albermarle wrote: »Is it correct to calculate the multiplier from a pension that will be taken early and therefore reduced ?
I thought you had to base it on the projected pension at NRD ?, which would reduce the multiplier .
The CETV offered is the same whether you want to take it early or not .
Yes. Compare the CETV now and a withdrawal rate with the early retirement pension, also payable now.
Makes less sense to compare a known CETV now with an unknown projected pension to a future date.0 -
The PCLS at £48,000 is actually quite good if you did decide not to transfer. Going by your figures the commutation factor works out at 20.87, which means you are getting nearly £21 of lump sum for every £1 of pension given-up.
It is however a tempting transfer value, but I would think its safer considering it on a SWR of 3% rather than 4% as there is sequence of returns risk to consider, especially if we have a poor first decade of returns.
Only have £320k of LTA left, so an LTA charge on the rest. No thanks.0 -
ffacoffipawb wrote: »Asked one of my deferred pension providers for an early retirement quote. Pension is £9,200 approximately.
PCLS of £48,000 and reduced pension of £6,900 available instead.
Transfer value has been provided, wait for it ... £399,000 approximately.
That's a 42x multiplier.
Given I have just crystallised 70% LTA this would take me over LTA which I wouldn't do anyway.
However could get a pension of £16,000 from this transfer value assuming a 4% SWR.
This multiplier must be a record?
4% is a WR. Not a SWR.Thus the old Gentleman ended his Harangue. The People heard it, and approved the Doctrine, and immediately practised the Contrary, just as if it had been a common Sermon; for the Vendue opened ...THE WAY TO WEALTH, Benjamin Franklin, 1758 AD0 -
FatherAbraham wrote: »4% is a WR. Not a SWR.
I did use the word "assuming".0 -
If all 320k was available for exclusive use for the 399k it could still be quite attractive. But that spousal benefit is also excellent and merits careful considerationffacoffipawb wrote: »Only have £320k of LTA left, so an LTA charge on the rest. No thanks.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

