We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Registered keeper 'at the material time'
Comments
-
Yes it was in Albert Street in Birmingham.0
-
Don't know what's happened to this thread, but it no longer makes much sense given that the original post is now about RoA after being charged in the earlier hours of the morning, then the OP amending their response to a request to show the Date of Issue of the claim.If it is a claim form then there should be an issue date printed on it. I believe it the top right corner. This will be a date earlier than the date you received it. Time frames for court submissions are based on the issue date.Parkingticket101 wrote: »h nnlkjl h nnlkjl
Not much point in any further responses unless/until the OP sorts out just what he/she is wanting. :cool:Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
I agree with the above, the content bears no relation to the title. Wayward editing I suspect.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
OP - have you read post 2 in the newbies thread? Covers landholder authrity etc
If this is VCS claiming for Albert St then yes, it was and i bleive IS Excel, and so you as defence point ONE state the claimant has no standing to issue a claim as VCS... reg co... is not hte same entity as the one offering alleged contracts at ... whi chis Excel.. reg company ....
Use full legal company names to hamer home that one company is not the same as the other. it is not a trading name / style etc but legally separate and distinct.0 -
Post 5 doesn't make any sense either.
Does anyone have an Enigma machine decoder?I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.
All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks0 -
This certainly made a lot more sense yesterday. The OP had received a claim form but, while being the registered keeper, was not actually the keeper after selling the vehicle and not updating the V5.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards