We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Lease car & Care Parking Metrolink Stretford

XinoFumeiro
Posts: 5 Forumite

Hi guys,
I have spent hours reading the Newbies thread and previous posts. I´ll go straight to the point on this one.
According to Care Parking, the driver parked on 19 February 2019 in a No Parking Area in Metrolink Stretford, which is own by Transport for Greater Manchester.
It is important to mention it is a lease car. I lease it from NHS Fleet, which at the same time leases it from a third company. From the information I have gathered:
In my opinion I can use on my appeal to Care Parking the fact that it took longer than 21 days to contact me since NHS Fleet nominated me, and maybe also the fact that Byelaws apply to Metrolink Parking. What are your advices? Should I stick to the first, and appeal using Edna Basher´s template:
Should I mention on the appeal the fact I know the date NHS Fleet nominated me? Should I also mention the fact that the parking is owned by Transport for Greater Manchester, byelaws apply and so on?
Thank you in advance
The Hirer
I have spent hours reading the Newbies thread and previous posts. I´ll go straight to the point on this one.
According to Care Parking, the driver parked on 19 February 2019 in a No Parking Area in Metrolink Stretford, which is own by Transport for Greater Manchester.
It is important to mention it is a lease car. I lease it from NHS Fleet, which at the same time leases it from a third company. From the information I have gathered:
- Care Parking sent a Notice to Keeper first to this unkown company. They nominated NHS Fleet as Hirer. I ignore the dates
- When contacted, NHS Fleet nomitated me as Hirer on 10th May 2019.
- I received a Notice to Hirer by post dated 17th June 2019
In my opinion I can use on my appeal to Care Parking the fact that it took longer than 21 days to contact me since NHS Fleet nominated me, and maybe also the fact that Byelaws apply to Metrolink Parking. What are your advices? Should I stick to the first, and appeal using Edna Basher´s template:
Dear Sir,
Parking Charge Notice [0123456789]: Vehicle Registration [AA11ABC]
I refer to the above-detailed Parking Charge Notice (“PCN”) issued to me by Highview Parking Ltd (“Highview”) as a Notice to Hirer. I confirm that as the hirer of this vehicle, I am its keeper for the purpose of the corresponding definition under Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (“POFA”) and I write to formally challenge the validity of this PCN.
You will no doubt be familiar with the strict requirements of Schedule 4 of POFA to be followed in order for a parking operator to be able to invoke keeper liability for a Parking Charge. There are a number of reasons why Highview’s Notice to Hirer did not comply with POFA; in order that you may understand why, I suggest that you carefully study the details of Paragraphs 13 and 14 of Schedule 4 in particular.
Given that Highview has forfeited its right to keeper liability, please confirm that you shall now cancel this charge. Alternatively, should you choose to reject my challenge, please provide me with details of the Independent Appeals Service (POPLA), their contact details and a unique POPLA appeal reference so that I may escalate the matter to POPLA.
Thank you for your cooperation and I look forward to receiving your response within the relevant timescales specified under the British Parking Association Ltd Code of Practice.
Yours faithfully,
[Insert squiggle as signature]
Parking Charge Notice [0123456789]: Vehicle Registration [AA11ABC]
I refer to the above-detailed Parking Charge Notice (“PCN”) issued to me by Highview Parking Ltd (“Highview”) as a Notice to Hirer. I confirm that as the hirer of this vehicle, I am its keeper for the purpose of the corresponding definition under Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (“POFA”) and I write to formally challenge the validity of this PCN.
You will no doubt be familiar with the strict requirements of Schedule 4 of POFA to be followed in order for a parking operator to be able to invoke keeper liability for a Parking Charge. There are a number of reasons why Highview’s Notice to Hirer did not comply with POFA; in order that you may understand why, I suggest that you carefully study the details of Paragraphs 13 and 14 of Schedule 4 in particular.
Given that Highview has forfeited its right to keeper liability, please confirm that you shall now cancel this charge. Alternatively, should you choose to reject my challenge, please provide me with details of the Independent Appeals Service (POPLA), their contact details and a unique POPLA appeal reference so that I may escalate the matter to POPLA.
Thank you for your cooperation and I look forward to receiving your response within the relevant timescales specified under the British Parking Association Ltd Code of Practice.
Yours faithfully,
[Insert squiggle as signature]
Should I mention on the appeal the fact I know the date NHS Fleet nominated me? Should I also mention the fact that the parking is owned by Transport for Greater Manchester, byelaws apply and so on?
Thank you in advance
The Hirer

0
Comments
-
Just use that template you found. Good research.I received a Notice to Hirer by post dated 17th June 2019
In my opinion I can use on my appeal to Care Parking the fact that it took longer than 21 days to contact me since NHS Fleet nominated me, and maybe also the fact that Byelaws apply to Metrolink Parking. What are your advices?
The main fault with the NTH is not the 21 days! It's the lack of statutory enclosures.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Don't forget to change Highview to something more appropriate in that template before sending - twice in fact.0
-
Both noted. Thank you Coupon-mad and KeithP0
-
I assume there were no hire or elase docs with the NTK
if not, that is a killer blow for them , never mind if POFA applies or if they failed POFA if it did apply (the land ownership question about TfGM and stations etc in the METROLINK domain is very complicated and convoluted , such that I do not believe that Keolis Amey or TfGM or anyone else understands the connotations or nuances
doesnt really matter what the driver did or didnt do on the day if they fail procedures and red tape paperwork, hence why you save that aspect for popla
yes use the EB template to get the popla code, because CARE wont cancel on the first appeal0 -
According to Care Parking, the driver parked on 19 February 2019 in a No Parking Area in Metrolink Stretford, which is own by Transport for Greater Manchester.
Surely this is not relevant land and therefore there is no keeper liability under POFA.
Nine times out of ten these tickets are scams so complain to your MP.
Parliament is well aware of the MO of these private parking companies, and on 15th March 2019 a Bill was enacted to curb the excesses of these shysters. Codes of Practice are being drawn up, an independent appeals service will be set up, and access to the DVLA's date base more rigorously policed, persistent offenders denied access to the DVLA database and unable to operate.
Hopefully life will become impossible for the worst of these scammers, but until this is done you should still complain to your MP, citing the new legislation.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2019/8/contents/enacted
Just as the clampers were finally closed down, so hopefully will many of these Private Parking Companies.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards