We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Stamp Duty Land Tax on Staircasing

I’ve tried without success to find out how much Stamp Duty Land Tax I will need to pay when I staircase to 100% on my Shared Ownership House.

My situation is as follows:

I purchased my 50% share in 2003 for £72,500 and paid stamp duty on this amount which was £725.00 (1%). The full market price in 2003 was £145,000.

I now want to purchase the remaining 50%, and the current full market valuation has come in at £280,000. So, to do this I need to pay the Housing Association £140,000 to get 100% ownership.

Different conveyancing solicitors have given me differing figures on what stamp duty will become payable on completion to 100%. I’ve looked at the HMRC website which just confused me further as none of their examples fit may situation.
Can anyone help?

Comments

  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 3,063 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    When you bought in 2003 you
    (a) paid the social landlord for a new lease? or
    (b) bought the lease from someone else who already had the lease?
    It makes a difference to the calculation.
  • rm01lp
    rm01lp Posts: 12 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 10 Posts
    We bought the lease from someone else.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 3,063 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I make the SDLT £300. It is calculated as 2% of the excess over £125,000.

    The normal complex rules about linked transactions for staircasing do not apply. That is because the 2003 transaction when you bought the lease was from a seller who is not a “connected person” to the social landlord who you pay for the staircasing. I do not think the HMRC guidance covers this situation.
  • rm01lp
    rm01lp Posts: 12 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 10 Posts
    Thank you so much for your reply, it makes complete sense.
  • rm01lp
    rm01lp Posts: 12 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 10 Posts
    Thanks for the advice again. Just out of interest do know if there is anything online where the rules which affect my situation might be? I'm just pre-empting having to provide something as the 3 conveyancing solicitors I've contacted say something different to each other - which is a little worrying!
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 3,063 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There is some HMRC guidance here: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/sdlt-shared-ownership-property and from the pages indexed here: https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/stamp-duty-land-tax-manual/sdltm27000 but I do not recall anything that exactly matches your circumstances.
    You could refer your conveyancers to the linked transaction rules in Finance Act 2003 section 108. You can say the two transactions cannot be linked because the two “vendors” are not “connected persons”.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.