We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Credit card refused online

I recently tried to pay for my car breakdown insurance with my credit card and was refused. This is because I do not have a mobile phone and so the card company was unable to send me a text with a verification number on it.
I am VERY careful with my money online but I feel this is going a step too far.
Why should I have to have a mobile phone to purchase stuff online. What will it be next No withdrawing cash from a machine without a text to your mobile?
I feel that people without these phones are being discriminated against. I have heard from my bank that MANY other people have been complaining about this.

Comments

  • Get a cheap PAYG phone.

    Honestly...
  • TheShape
    TheShape Posts: 1,905 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    'I feel that people without these phones are being discriminated against.'

    You might be being discriminated against but discrimination isn't illegal.
  • MisterBaxter
    MisterBaxter Posts: 666 Forumite
    TheShape wrote: »
    'I feel that people without these phones are being discriminated against.'

    You might be being discriminated against but discrimination isn't illegal.

    As this sort of thing is more likely to affect older people it could be argued to be a form of indirect age discrimination which may be illegal; people with certain disabilities may also be more adversely affected which again may be a form of indirect discrimination and therefore illegal.

    With that said I'm assuming that the people behind these changes have done a full impact assessment and are completely satisfied that it is compliant with the Equalities Act and that it won't be challenged by any of the spcial interest groups represent such people.
  • K80_Black
    K80_Black Posts: 466 Forumite
    100 Posts
    My bank has an option to ring your land-line too. Look for a bank offering this, and switch.
  • T-G-C
    T-G-C Posts: 591 Forumite
    500 Posts
    Unless you have a protected characteristic which falls under the relevant legislation, I am afraid that the bank are not compelled to accommodate alternative arrangements for their security verification process.

    In this era, it is an expectation that customers will have access to a mobile telephone. This is a direct and secure method of verification for online transactions.

    You can obtain a free SIM from one of the leading mobile operators, in addition to a basic handset for less than £20.

    If you refuse to conform to this expectation, then I am afraid you will be at a loss. With even stricter regulations coming into force soon, mobile phone verification will be even more prevalent.
    Advice provided from this account does not consist of any professional knowledge. For professional debt advice, please contact either National Debtline or StepChange. Advice may consist of personal experience, opinion and/or informational sources.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,377 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    As this sort of thing is more likely to affect older people it could be argued to be a form of indirect age discrimination which may be illegal

    Try getting a 35 year mortgage when your 80 years old then.
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • MisterBaxter
    MisterBaxter Posts: 666 Forumite
    beany_bot wrote: »
    Try getting a 35 year mortgage when your 80 years old then.

    Not really the same thing though is it; there are strong justifiable reasons for not giving an 80-year-old a 35 mortgage whereas there are other mechanisms that could be used for verification that don't limit or exclude access which is why such limitations could be seen as indirect discrimination, it's a matter of reasonable adjustment to accommodate as wide a possible audience.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.