We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

s75 claim time limits

Has anyone tried to reclaim their money from a credit card provider under s75 of the Consumer Credit Act for a purchase back as far as 2005?



My dad bought a dud "investment" in 2005, and paid a deposit on a credit card. The company was shut by the regulator shortly thereafter, but is only now being wound down. The owners have long since frittered the original investors away.



As I understand it, there isn't a time limit for making a claim under Section 75, however the statute of limitations in the UK is six years so it may not be relevant, but I wanted to check if anyone has tried, if they made an original deposit on a credit card.

Comments

  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,096 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Even if it wasn't time barred, I suspect that the firm wouldn't accept an S75 because he made a poor investment choice

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Newnoel
    Newnoel Posts: 378 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Section 75 does indeed cover scams:
    https://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/135/135-case-studies-about-scams.html#l


    I am more interested in whether anyone has successfully got around any time limitations?
  • Nick_C
    Nick_C Posts: 7,562 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Home Insurance Hacker!
    Newnoel wrote: »
    Section 75 does indeed cover scams:

    But only if there has been a breach of contract!
  • Newnoel
    Newnoel Posts: 378 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    I would have said a scam was a pretty major breach of contract.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,096 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Newnoel wrote: »
    I would have said a scam was a pretty major breach of contract.


    OP said her dad bought a "dud" investment, not that it was a scam.


    Unless they clarify what "dud" means (to me, it means bought into a firm that performed poorly) then I'd say no. If it was a scam, sure they might but the age will be a big factor

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Newnoel
    Newnoel Posts: 378 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Nasqueron wrote: »
    . If it was a scam, sure they might but the age will be a big factor

    This

    Can a s75 be enforced 10+ years later?
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Newnoel wrote: »

    Can a s75 be enforced 10+ years later?
    Ask your bank.

    However, I doubt you'll be refunded regardless for failed investments regardless of the timescale ..
  • Bermonia
    Bermonia Posts: 977 Forumite
    500 Posts
    Whilst officially there appears to be no time limit to a s75 claim, general rule tends to be six years due to data retention requirements and statute of limitations for court cases - given this it is unlikely a s75 claim would succeed after all this time as lender could you make the case that due to passage of time it is unable to properly assess... both FOS and courts would not be able to intervene.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 240.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 616.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.4K Life & Family
  • 253.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.