We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

The tax treatment of OEICs/ITs/ETFs

Options
C_Mababejive
C_Mababejive Posts: 11,668 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
I'm trying to learn about the tax treatment of various investments with a view to generating growth but minimising personal taxation.

I know that if income is distributed then it is treated as taxable income,like dividends.

What about investments such as OEICs? Effectively what are the best vehicles for generating growth without flagging any or too much as taxable incomes?

Thanks
Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..

Comments

  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 9 June 2019 at 7:05AM
    There is a phrase "dont let the tax tail wag the dog".
    In any case there is no magic, unless you perhaps look at VCTs, but its easy to get your fingers burned with them.

    Income is treated as income whether its distributed or accumulated.
    Have you maximised ISAs and SIPPs?
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    an OEIC is not a tax wrapper, so will not prevent it being taxable income.

    Whether income or accumulation, an OEIC is simply a legal structure for the way the investment fund operates, it has nothing to do with your tax exposure. You can read up on the history of the transition from "unit trust" to OEIC yourself, for that is now what it is, nothing more than a page in history.
  • C_Mababejive
    C_Mababejive Posts: 11,668 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Yes,,but what i am thinking of is say you hold an investment that pays a dividend of 6% but the distributed element of an OEIC is 1.6% then the tax position would be less obviously with the caveat expressed by "anotherJoe". ???

    Equally, you might have taxable savings exposed to 20% and you might instead consider moving them to a diversified IT with a taxable position of maybe 7.5% with acceptance of a change in risk profile.
    Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 9 June 2019 at 10:45AM
    Yes,,but what i am thinking of is say you hold an investment that pays a dividend of 6% but the distributed element of an OEIC is 1.6% then the tax position would be less obviously with the caveat expressed by "anotherJoe". ???
    It doesn't matter whats distributed it comes to the same thing. The only (main?) pooled investment with special tax treatment is VCTs.


    Equally, you might have taxable savings exposed to 20% and you might instead consider moving them to a diversified IT with a taxable position of maybe 7.5% with acceptance of a change in risk profile.


    Thats a wholly different thing. Thats saving vs investing.

    Getting back to the start, you said initially "generating growth but minimising personal taxation"
    Why?

    Shouldn't your aim be to maximise overall growth after tax, whatever the combination of growth and income?
    The way you've stated it, 1% growth and no personal taxation would be preferable to 200% growth and 1% personal taxation.
    You also didn't answer my Q, have you maximised SIPPs and ISAs? Because thats the simple way to do it.
  • C_Mababejive
    C_Mababejive Posts: 11,668 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Well im about to do some Bed and ISA activities and have a look at a SIPP top up. Can i have 200% growth and 1% taxation..??
    Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.