We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Use up savings allowances vs risk
stphnstevey
Posts: 3,227 Forumite
Have £5+£1k savings allowances
P2P used to pay 7-10%, but defaults are more common and overall return has fallen
Attempt to reduce risk with Assetz Capital QAA and Mintos buyback loans
Maxed high interest bank accounts
Any other ideas?
P2P used to pay 7-10%, but defaults are more common and overall return has fallen
Attempt to reduce risk with Assetz Capital QAA and Mintos buyback loans
Maxed high interest bank accounts
Any other ideas?
0
Comments
-
Change your strategy. The higher the return on offer the higher the possibility of capital loss. First rule of investing is don't lose capital. Second rule is don't forget rule number one.0
-
Most posters on this forum are advocates of investing in the stock markets , although a lot of different views on the best way to do it and what risks to take .
Have you considered this rather than more 'alternative' ways like P2P ?0 -
Albermarle wrote: »Most posters on this forum are advocates of investing in the stock markets , although a lot of different views on the best way to do it and what risks to take .
Have you considered this rather than more 'alternative' ways like P2P ?
Yes, of course, for the bulk of my investments, but I still have savings allowance and I have sought out P2P that has, I believe, the minimum risk and maximum liquidity (all that can change quickly I know, but I am happy with risking this amount)0 -
stphnstevey wrote: »I have sought out P2P that has, I believe, the minimum risk and maximum liquidity
I think you need to revisit this statement. P2P is far from "minimum risk" and as for "liquidity", i hear endless cases of people having their believed "easy access capital" returned to them in a matter of weeks, sometimes months and usually with penalties so their original invested capital is not returned 100%.
If you find yourself in a 2008 scenario, then the term "maximum liquidity" will seem like a fairy tale moment you're never going to experience.
Not to say P2P isn't a legitimate investment, but to batch it as low risk and highly liquid is a dangerously misleading statement. When you start mentioning it (as you did in your other post) in a discussion about emergency funds, then people need to be made aware that P2P is NOT something that should be considered.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 347.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.2K Spending & Discounts
- 240.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 616.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 175.4K Life & Family
- 253.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards