Civil Enforcement ANPR Defence

Le_Kirk

If you follow THIS LINK and then scroll down until you see this: -

Here are some cases won or in progress:

Here is a defence I suggested for a case where a RingGo app carried forward a default VRN for the wrong car, so that the driver was not at fault and the inaccuracy came from the PPC's app:

.........you will find several concise defences. Compare them to yours and see what you can sensibly leave out, without losing the thrust of your argument and defending the POC.

Coupon-mad

The defence looks fine.

These will be useful for your later WS & evidence:

‘ClearView Communications’ report a ‘95%’ success rate if [a user] ‘Get this right’ - referring to “10 ANPR commandments to ensure that the accuracy and reliability of your system is maximised.” 95% would mean 1-in-20 results are wrong, or missed.
https://clearview-communications.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/The-10-Commandments-of-ANPR-1.pdf


This fault is known as ‘double-dipping’. This 'double dip' fault in ANPR evidence is a fact confirmed by the BPA in which they state that “As with all new technology, there are issues associated with its use: Repeat users of a car park inside a 24-hour period sometimes find that their first entry is paired with their last exit, resulting in an ‘overstay’. Operators are becoming aware of this and should now be checking all ANPR transactions to ensure that this does not occur.”
https://www.britishparking.co.uk/ANPR


Further evidence of the scale of the fault with ANPR evidence is covered in the BBC Watchdog programme which was screened on the 18/04/2018. The relevant clip can be viewed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIaKMkO3YVM.


This problem has become so pandemic that MPs have agreed to enact a Bill to regulate these scammers. Here is a video taken at the House of Commons, discussing this issue:https://parliamentlive.tv/event/index/2f0384f2-eba5-4fff-ab07-cf24b6a22918?in=12:49:41


A list of 90+ cases of ANPR ‘Double-Dipping’ can be found here for reference:
http://notomob.co.uk/discussions/index.php?topic=5768,0

johnny7gun

Coupon-mad wrote: »

The defence looks fine.

These will be useful for your later WS & evidence:

Thanks, I really appreciate the feedback!