We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Must you remortgage after buying freehold

mollymikki
mollymikki Posts: 2 Newbie
edited 25 May 2019 at 11:08PM in House buying, renting & selling
I bought a leasehold flat a year ago (125 years) for 200,000 pounds, so not a big one.
Now the other two flats (in one side of a building, an old Victorian place), are up for sale and the freeholder wants to sell them with a share of freehold, with me buying a share too.
Would I need to renegotiate my mortgage or does this not affect it?
Do I need to pay stamp duty again (I have another house so I would have to pay the extra percentage)
If I dont buy a share of freehold would this devalue my flat or make it hard to sell?
I can't really afford all the costs to buy a share of freehold but don't want to risk my flat being devalued as a result of not buying a share.
I'm an older person too (57) so can't get a long cheaper mortgage and its harder to find lenders who will consider me because of age to retirement.
My freeholder is the church next door and I would prefer if they sold the other two as leasehold but I think they want to be free of responsibility and potential costs of maintenance.
However, they own the adjoining half of the house which they use for an office and I know they have been weighing up what to do.
Help please!

Comments

  • da_rule
    da_rule Posts: 3,618 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Your mortgage does not affect it (unless you potentially need to borrow more to pay for the freehold).

    There may be stamp duty liability, but this is difficult to say without knowing how much you are potentially paying for the freehold.

    A simpler way to deal with freehold ownership between groups of parties may be for the freehold to be sold to a limited company and then each flat is given a share in the company and all owners are made directors. This helps separate all the different hats everyone has to wear. It also means that when you come to sell you only have to transfer your share in the company rather than actually transferring the freehold.
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mollymikki wrote: »
    If I dont buy a share of freehold would this devalue my flat or make it hard to sell?
    The current value reflects the fact that you don't own the freehold (and that it's possible for anyone else to become the freeholder) so no, it won't "devalue" it. It may improve the marketability (and perhaps the value) if you are able to sell it with a share of the freehold.
  • Tom99
    Tom99 Posts: 5,371 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary
    See what the current freeholder is going to offer you.
    They want to sell the other 2 flats and offload the freehold management as well, and all 3 flats having 1/3rd of the freehold interest (via ltd co if possible) is a neat arrangement so its possible you could negotiate a reasonable or even free deal since if you don't buy your share of the freehold then they will either have to sell the freehold to the 2 remaining flats or come to some other arrangement.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,988 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It is unlikely that the value of the freehold, which will be subject to long leases at low rents, will be anything like high enough to suffer an SDLT charge.
  • Thank you all for the advice, it is hugely appreciated.

    Your shared wisdom has been invaluable - I was very worried and don't really have anyone to talk it trough with - I'm glad I posted to the forum and you were kind enough to take time to respond..
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Remember, you're going to finish up owning two separate things.
    1. Your leasehold flat - same as you've always done. There's a mortgage secured against it.
    2. A share in the freehold.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.