We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Probate valuations and capital gains tax

I'm in the process of selling my parents' house after my dad died in January. The RICS valuation we received seemed low to me (£300,000) and I mentioned it at the time to the probate lawyer and to the company managing the sale. I asked for the house to be marketed at £350k. I now have an offer of £355k on the table, which I've accepted (and which I feel bears out my belief that the house was worth more - I had three separate valuations by other estate agents). The probate lawyer has now written to me saying I may be liable for capital gains tax on the £55k extra.

This is frustrating given that I felt the RICS valuation was too low. Can I challenge the valuation? I am a very low earner so I know that I am entitled to an 'annual exemption amount' of £12,000 on the gain, but that doesn't go far. Is there anything else I can do? Thank you.
«13

Comments

  • foxy-stoat
    foxy-stoat Posts: 6,879 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 May 2019 at 1:57PM
    Did you buy the property at £300,000 off The Estate or inherited it and now you are selling it for £355,000...if so and this was a second home then yes you will probably have a CGT liability.

    You will be £43,000 up on the deal so if you are liable you are still winning.
  • babyblade41
    babyblade41 Posts: 3,967 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    When valuing for probate I was happy for the low value as less IHT tax payable ..

    You could challenge the valuation if the 3 other valuations were similar to what it eventually sold for, but they must be in writing .. I'm not sure you would get too far in this though as you would be challenging HMRC and in my experience aren't very forgiving !!
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If the probate valuation had been higher, would that have resulted in more IHT payable, and if so who would have been paying it?
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 24 May 2019 at 2:05PM
    Who is selling the property the estate or you?
  • foxy-stoat
    foxy-stoat Posts: 6,879 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Who is selling the property the estate or you?

    This is frustrating given that I felt the RICS valuation was too low. Can I challenge the valuation? I am a very low earner so I know that I am entitled to an 'annual exemption amount' of £12,000 on the gain, but that doesn't go far. Is there anything else I can do? Thank you.

    It would seem that the individual is the one selling as they mention that they are a low earner....either way they are looking at netting close to a third of a million pounds cash, so a bit of extra tax shouldn't be too much of a bitter pill to swallow.
  • SmashedAvacado
    SmashedAvacado Posts: 1,262 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary
    davidmcn wrote: »
    If the probate valuation had been higher, would that have resulted in more IHT payable, and if so who would have been paying it?

    in most cases there is no IHT and that might be the case here in which case the probate valuation is annoying and ideally you would want to challenge it assuming there were some debts etc and the overall estate value was lower than the threshold. .
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    sarahs999 wrote: »
    I am a very low earner so I know that I am entitled to an 'annual exemption amount' of £12,000 on the gain, but that doesn't go far. Is there anything else I can do? Thank you.

    Selling fees are deductible before CGT liability is calculated. Likewise if the estate is selling the property the RICS valuation fees can be deducted.

    What was the value of the entire declared estate at probate?
  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 19,389 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Where this is a large difference between the declared value of a property for IHT purposes and the sale price only a few months later, there is usually a request to adopt the sale price as the value for IHT
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    you will struggle to get HMRC to accept the substitution of the sales value for the original probate value


    there is actually case law around just such an event and it decided that upwards valuations are not allowed where no inheritance tax was originally paid - ie as already mentioned the value was not "ascertained" for probate purposes


    see Stoner v Inland Revenue
    https://library.croneri.co.uk/cch_uk/btcbin/2001-spc-288
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.