📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Woodford Concerns

1155156158160161172

Comments

  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    No one there had the cojones to value it at zero when Woodford brought it back from his US travels. And to be fair I suspect that would have been a sackable offence and they had a mortgage to pay.
    So I guess the long term plan was to upvalue and then gradually revalue down to zero as if it had promise but didn't work out, "just bad luck", " some of these companies don't pan out", " worth the risk" - insert your own cliche
    The alternative is they are so stupid they shouldn't be in charge of valuing anything. These isn't a way round this. Corrupt or utterly gullible. Take your pick.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    80p in the pound for something Woodford has valued sounds like too much to me. Not so much vultures, more parrots.

    You are obviously far better informed than many. ;)
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 5 November 2019 at 3:29PM
    I have the same information as you.
    Multiple companies gone bust. Some just weeks after injecting millions.
    Multiple companies drastically reduced in value.
    Multiple companies needing cash infusions to stay solvent.
    At least one company valued at millions when it's clearly worthless.
    Given all that, 80% of what's left seems generous, unless you know more than I do and know all the bad news is out of the way, all the devaluations are in the past.
  • Brian65
    Brian65 Posts: 255 Forumite
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    So I guess the long term plan was to upvalue
    My understanding is Woodford & sidekick wouldn't have got their £60 million dividend if they hadn't inflated the valuation as their fees are based on it?
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    Multiple companies needing cash infusions to stay solvent.

    That's the nature of early stage companies. The earlier one invests the greater slice of the potential pie. As funding rounds go forward a value is placed on the R&D to date. If early stage investors were diluted in terms of their share holding no one would ever be an angel investor. There would be no benefit.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Yes but Woodford seems to have gone ***** out to do that in spades
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    Yes but Woodford seems to have gone ***** out to do that in spades

    The TV programme Dragons Den is a consumer version of the real world that does exist. Facebook, Amazon, Apple etc would never have existed without people with deep pockets.
  • iglad
    iglad Posts: 222 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic
    WPCT tonight at 32.5p I expect it to go below 30p quite soon.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    iglad wrote: »
    WPCT tonight at 32.5p I expect it to go below 30p quite soon.

    Depends on the performance of the underlying investments. Only takes one to IPO or generate a spin off company. There's some interesting activities undertaken buried within the portfolio. Once the shareholdings in WEIF are digested. Then no reason why the share price won't improve. Though unquoted companies will result in a permanently high discount.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    The TV programme Dragons Den is a consumer version of the real world that does exist. Facebook, Amazon, Apple etc would never have existed without people with deep pockets.
    And ? No one would dispute that, however most that do invest in startups, and I did once meet one of the top people in the US that do that (Tom Perkins) do have the ability to pick some moonshots. Woodford seems have specialised only in rockets that blew up spectacularly on the launchpad
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.