We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Woodford Concerns

1120121123125126171

Comments

  • Reaper wrote: »
    They say:
    we calculate that as a percentage of NAV 79% is in unquoteds, 23% in "quoteds with no trading" and 17% is in quoted companies


    Wow. I had no idea. Another misleading name, he should have just called it Private Equity.

    So 119% invested.

    Gearing or poor maths?
  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    So 119% invested.

    Gearing or poor maths?

    Gearing, as described in the earlier linked report from which the quote was taken.
  • When (IF) the fund opens again and say only 50% (or any other figure) want out. How do you make sure you are at the front of the queue?
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    hamishdog wrote: »
    When (IF) the fund opens again and say only 50% (or any other figure) want out. How do you make sure you are at the front of the queue?


    Its most likely they will apply a mechanism to dissuade sellers.

    Might be a premium to sell, thats what REITs did a few years back.Gradually lowered over time.

    Or might be a maximum amount you can sell per holding.
    Their plan/hope will be that the mechanism means they dont run into liquidity problems.
    However, if say 50% wish to sell despite the dissuasion, thats going to be close to impossible.
    A second gating would be very embarrassing though so i thought he wouldnt risk that but as i type this, what occurs to me is that Woodford might do this precisely so he can blame panicking investors for being forced to shutter the fund rather than it being his decision.

    Yep, I can see that happening. He's already blamed them for not being patient enough with WPCTs list of failing investments so why not. That way its not about him and his catastrophic investment records, "it would have come good if only investors had understood"
  • poppy10_2
    poppy10_2 Posts: 6,588 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Reaper wrote: »
    They say:
    we calculate that as a percentage of NAV 79% is in unquoteds, 23% in "quoteds with no trading" and 17% is in quoted companies


    Wow. I had no idea. Another misleading name, he should have just called it Private Equity.
    They got it wrong. 79% of GAV is in unquoteds. That includes the approx £100million overdraft. If you only take net asset value the percentage of unquoteds is significantly higher
    poppy10
  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    poppy10 wrote: »
    Reaper wrote: »
    They say:
    we calculate that as a percentage of NAV 79% is in unquoteds, 23% in "quoteds with no trading" and 17% is in quoted companies
    They got it wrong. 79% of GAV is in unquoteds. That includes the approx £100million overdraft. If you only take net asset value the percentage of unquoteds is significantly higher
    Isn't it you that got it wrong?

    Because their "...we calculate that..." is telling you that it's already the result of a calculation to convert % of GAV (66% of which is unquoted, 20% quoted with no trading, 14% regular quoted, total 100% of portfolio) to an approx % of NAV (79, 23, 17, with roundings, total 119% of NAV, while borrowings are -19% of NAV)
  • Scarpacci
    Scarpacci Posts: 1,017 Forumite
    The sharp movement in the pound over the past two days is hitting the global companies which benefited from the depreciating currency. The likes of Diageo, Unilever, Diageo, Reckitt, GSK, etc. are all down over 2%. The improving sentiment towards a US-China trade truce also not helping, though how many times have we been whipsawed by that.

    I think it's going to be another tough month for the Terry Smith, Nick Train-style investors. Not that either of them claims to be a man for all markets, of course.

    It is interesting to wonder if what Woodford was waiting for might finally be happening. A look at today's FTSE risers paints a prettier picture for him today.

    Perhaps a more pressing question might be whether it matters now, given the reputational hit and the outflows of the non-gated assets. You can be right eventually but have it come too late.
    This is everybody's fault but mine.
  • AnotherJoe
    AnotherJoe Posts: 19,622 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Scarpacci wrote: »
    The sharp movement in the pound over the past two days is hitting the global companies which benefited from the depreciating currency. The likes of Diageo, Unilever, Diageo, Reckitt, GSK, etc. are all down over 2%. The improving sentiment towards a US-China trade truce also not helping, though how many times have we been whipsawed by that.

    I think it's going to be another tough month for the Terry Smith, Nick Train-style investors. Not that either of them claims to be a man for all markets, of course.

    It is interesting to wonder if what Woodford was waiting for might finally be happening. A look at today's FTSE risers paints a prettier picture for him today.

    Woodford isn't waiting for the Pound to rise. Woodford is waiting for the disastrous selection of failing/failed companies he bought to come good.


    Scarpacci wrote: »
    Perhaps a more pressing question might be whether it matters now, given the reputational hit and the outflows of the non-gated assets. You can be right eventually but have it come too late.


    If "being right eventually" consists of the pound rising by 2% in a few days perhaps you can inform us what colour the sky is on your planet.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Scarpacci wrote: »
    I think it's going to be another tough month for the Terry Smith, Nick Train-style investors. Not that either of them claims to be a man for all markets, of course.

    Nick Train is bemoaning holding an underperforming Pearson in all their funds for so long. Around a 20% fall in the share price since last months profit warning.
  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    edited 11 October 2019 at 2:05PM
    AnotherJoe wrote: »
    Woodford isn't waiting for the Pound to rise. Woodford is waiting for the disastrous selection of failing/failed companies he bought to come good.

    If "being right eventually" consists of the pound rising by 2% in a few days perhaps you can inform us what colour the sky is on your planet.
    Woodford is not a play on the strength of the pound but on his opinion that UK companies are under recognised and some of them have unnecessarily low valuations.

    Following last night's pointer to a potential less-hard Brexit than feared, not only did sterling strengthen by a couple of percent as mentioned, but a broad swathe of UK-focused businesses have decent share price rises. For example in my portfolio tracker I see Tesco and WHSmith up 6.6% today, Syncona up 6% and Lloyds is close to double that (as in a favourable Brexit scenario, consumers and businesses would be more confident and interest rates are at lower risk of being cut further).

    RBS are currently leading the FTSE risers with about 15% and lots of UK- exposed businesses (Persimmon, Intu, Kingfisher etc) have double digit percentages.

    These swings are a bigger than a couple of hundred bps on the FX rate.

    FWIW, WPCT has not moved much. Having bought in the mid 60p range, and not done any 'averaging down' since then, I am a buyer today at 37p.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.