📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Always refused PPI, but Gladstone Brooke’s says I have had it.

Options
I thought I’d check just on the off chance. I always refused PPI, I could see it was a rip off from the first time it was offered to me. However I thought it was worth double checking before the deadline. I contacted Gladstone Brooke's, and they came back saying that they have found accounts with PPI on them. At the time I was on holiday, and I asked them to not to contact me until my return. I kid you not they called me another 15+ times while I was away usually several times a day, so I told them I was no longer interested. They still contacted me, so I've now put on a GDPR complaint against them (they've still contacted me a further five times).

All of my accounts are over six years old and and have fallen off my credit file, ideally out of principle I'd now like to pursue this myself, however I don't have any of the account details. Gladstone Brookes were able to find them, so any idea how I would go about finding them myself?

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    They haven't found anything. They're just signing you up to the suckers list.

    If you feel you had PPI, write to the lender concerned. But it seems clear you didn't.
  • Chris-TT
    Chris-TT Posts: 16 Forumite
    They have said they’ve found at least one. I went through the process of telling them who I’ve had loans and credit cards with and signing a form for them to look into it. I’m fairly sure on one of the calls they said it was ether a Barclaycard or Barclays overdraft. What do I say to them though? I have none of the account details anymore and no proof that I ever held accounts with them, surely it’s not in there interest to reveal anything as over six years have past?
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    You ask them if you had PPI. If you did, you submit your complaint.

    It doesn't matter if it's in their interest or not. It's not as if they have a choice.
  • robber2
    robber2 Posts: 559 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Chris-TT wrote: »
    They have said they’ve found at least one....................


    Well they would wont they.
  • Chris-TT
    Chris-TT Posts: 16 Forumite
    Sure. However I can’t see why it would be in there interest to lie, I already signed up to there ‘no obligation’ service. They must have found something to trigger them to keep calling and even writing to say they had found PPI on at least one of the accounts.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    See post 2. PPI is almost over. They need to build the suckers list for the next bandwagon.

    They don't care if you had PPI or not. The call staff just need to keep their jobs and they can only do that by signing people up.
  • Nasqueron
    Nasqueron Posts: 10,761 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Chris-TT wrote: »
    Sure. However I can’t see why it would be in there interest to lie, I already signed up to there ‘no obligation’ service. They must have found something to trigger them to keep calling and even writing to say they had found PPI on at least one of the accounts.


    If you gave them a proper Letter of Authority then they are able to speak to the banks on your behalf so they may well have found a policy that you weren't aware of (something you could have done yourself just by asking the bank). The question now will be whether you can get out of this contract or if they will charge you for wasting their time by not proceeding - read the terms and conditions about whether you can complain yourself directly.

    Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness: 

    People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.

  • Chris-TT
    Chris-TT Posts: 16 Forumite
    It was a contract but was a no obligation deal, it’s the only reason I went with it. They sold it in such a way that I could use them, or pursue it myself. I wrongly presumed they’d give me the details... however all they’ve done is tell me that I did have PPI and then harassed me with phone calls and letters to try and get me to get them to pursue it through them, which I guess given the circumstances should have been expected.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.