We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Cat N motorcycle

Carnmore
Carnmore Posts: 137 Forumite
Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
Apologies if this is the wrong forum.

I'm considering getting a Cat N Triumph Scrambler.

Is there an accurate online valuation tool for motorcycles and how much will Cat N status affect the value?

Will the insurance premium be significantly increased? I've read the insurance companies require an MOT but the bike is 2017 so not due an MOT.

Thanks in advance.

Comments

  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,895 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Carnmore wrote: »
    I've read the insurance companies require an MOT but the bike is 2017 so not due an MOT.
    There''s nothing to stop you getting an MOT if that's what the insurers want.
  • MEM62
    MEM62 Posts: 5,351 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The problem with any bike that has been previously written-off is selling it. Nobody will want it when you want to change for something else. It should therefore be cheap - really cheap to the point where it doesn't matter to you if you cannot sell it on. Unfortunately, most post write-off bikes do not reflect this and are over priced (often only a few quid cheaper than a bike with a clean history), which is why I would never buy one.
  • wgl2014
    wgl2014 Posts: 1,144 Forumite
    Not really an answer to your question but.....

    Be extremely careful buying a previously written off bike. Unless you can see absolute proof of the damage and what was repaired (and by whom) there could be all sorts of hidden issues.

    Personally unless I was experienced in bike mechanics and the particular model being looked at it would be too much of a risk.
  • Goudy
    Goudy Posts: 2,242 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It is impossible to value written off vehicles accurately unless it's by weight for scrap.

    As already mentioned, they can be a minefield.

    If you consider it's quite a high end brand and still quite new, the damage (Cat N is cosmetic and/or electrical) would have been quite extensive for the insurance to write it off rather than pay for the repair, and it's repair would have to have been economical (cheap) enough for it to be worth while for someone.
    These don't really add up to a decent proposition.

    As it's so hard to value, some insurance companies won't offer cover for them or offer polices with high premiums or high excesses, but there are specialist that'll insure nearly anything with wheels if you don't mind what sort of cover you get.

    One thing does jump to mind is why is it still on the insurance register?
    Anyone with half a brain would have bought another frame with a logbook and rebuilt it around that, which makes me think that it's repair was probably half arsed and as you're asking about value, someone's being greedy with it.

    Again, it's already been mentioned, but you can MOT it if you need to at any time, it doesn't even need a logbook or number plates, they can do it on the VIN.
  • Carnmore
    Carnmore Posts: 137 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    Just been informed the Cat N damage was a snapped oil pump chain causing damage to internal casings and the clutch. All damaged parts have either been replaced or repaired.
  • wgl2014
    wgl2014 Posts: 1,144 Forumite
    That sounds unlikely to me. Insurance is for accidents, fire damage or thefts not mechanical breakdown.
  • MEM62
    MEM62 Posts: 5,351 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    wgl2014 wrote: »
    That sounds unlikely to me. Insurance is for accidents, fire damage or thefts not mechanical breakdown.

    +1 on that. Even if it is true, the value needs to be significantly lower than a comparable machine with a clean history. Better still, the OP should steer clear altogether.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.