We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Tenant or Lodger
Comments
-
-
Hi artful. Looking at the ShelterScotland link (incidentally, very impressed by the new PRT tenancies!), I note two things perhaps relevant here:theartfullodger wrote: »NB: In Scotland (sensible country..) a "lodger" is anyway a common-law tenant, eviction only possible via FTT or Sheriff court.
http://scotland.shelter.org.uk/legal/security_of_tenure/common_law_tenants_and_non-tenant_occupiers
and two:What is a private residential tenancy?
A private residential tenancy is one that meets the following conditions:- the tenancy started on or after 1 December 2017
- it is let to you as a separate dwelling (home)
- you must be an individual, meaning not a company
- it's your main or only home
- you must have a lease (although a written agreement is not needed for a lease to exist)
- the tenancy is not an exempt tenancy, as listed below.
Does this potentially alter things, or is the fact that a Scotish 'lodger' is a common law tenat mean that this would still be a PRT?Tenancies that can not be private residential tenancy
Almost all new private tenancies created on or after 1st December 2017 will be private residential tenancies.
However, there are a number of exemptions, including the following:- Tenancies at a low rent
- Tenancies of shops
- Licensed premises
- Tenancies of agricultural land
- Lettings to students (meaning purpose built student accommodation)
- Holiday lettings
- Resident landlords
- Police Housing
- Military Housing
- Social Housing
- Sublet, assigned etc. social housing
- Homeless persons
- Persons on probation or released from prison etc.
- Accommodation for asylum seekers
- Displaced persons
- Shared ownership
- Tenancies under previous legislation
- Assured or short assured tenancies
0 -
Cheers G_M: My understanding (I am but an amateur..) is that a common law tenancy is not a PRT.
Can't see how landlord can claim to be a "resident" landlord in his Glasgow flat: FTT would decide if necessary.
Slàinte mhath!0 -
Original Posterdonaldfleming wrote: »What does Op stand for?
Opening Post
Original Post
whichever best fits the rest of the words0 -
I agree 'resident landlord' would be a dubious claim, but it's not clear-cut.theartfullodger wrote: »Can't see how landlord can claim to be a "resident" landlord in his Glasgow flat: FTT would decide if necessary.
Slàinte mhath!
And how about "it is let to you as a separate dwelling (home)"? If the LL keeps, maintains and uses one room, can it be described as 'seperate'?
I don't know.0 -
The Scottish Act appears to define a situation where the occupant has a bedroom and cooking facilities as a "separate home".I agree 'resident landlord' would be a dubious claim, but it's not clear-cut.
And how about "it is let to you as a separate dwelling (home)"? If the LL keeps, maintains and uses one room, can it be described as 'seperate'?
I don't know.
In fact the law has been drawn up so that it is not possible to make informal but perfectly sensible arrangements when it comes to housing. Obviously this results in some houses being left empty when they could be occupied.0 -
Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this thread.
The tenant/lodger will be the person responsible for paying Council Tax on the property in Glasgow, whilst the landlord is responsible for paying Council Tax on his main residence in Edinburgh.
Is this not a clear case for the rental arrangement being classed as a tenancy, and rules out the person renting being a lodger?0 -
Not as far as council tax legislation is concerned - the property will be a council tax HMO for which the landlord remains liable for the council tax charge (The landlord has no choice in the matter).The tenant/lodger will be the person responsible for paying Council Tax on the property in GlasgowI no longer work in Council Tax Recovery but instead work as a specialist Council Tax paralegal assisting landlords and Council Tax payers with council tax disputes and valuation tribunals. My views are my own reading of the law and you should always check with the local authority in question.0 -
no, how many times have you already been told what you write down on paper does not alter statute law.donaldfleming wrote: »Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this thread.
The tenant/lodger will be the person responsible for paying Council Tax on the property in Glasgow, whilst the landlord is responsible for paying Council Tax on his main residence in Edinburgh.
Is this not a clear case for the rental arrangement being classed as a tenancy, and rules out the person renting being a lodger?
statute law determines who is liable for paying council tax and what their status is for housing law purposes
in your case statute law defines (as i said earlier) a council tax HMO and that is what you have. The LL is liable in that case, never, ever the tenant or lodger.
you can of course include in your contract that the occupant has to pay you extra £ for "council tax" but that is a payment from them to you. The bill will always legally be in your name, not the occupants name.
If you make the occupant "responsible" for the bill it will back fire on you. The council has no option under the law but to chase you for all unpaid amounts, even if the occupant has paid the council directly themselves. The occupant has no legal liability to pay the council, and the council has no other legal option than to refund all monies paid by the occupant to the occupant, and then chase you for the entire now unpaid amount.
Your contract with the occupant would give you a legal basis to sue the occupant for whatever money your contract says they owe you ("the council tax") but that is a contract dispute between you and the occupant. Meantime it is you who could face fines and prison for non payment of the council tax as it is you who is legally the only person liable to pay it
this is law, it is not a matter of debate0 -
donaldfleming wrote: »The tenant/lodger will be responsible for paying the Council Tax and electricity. The landlord will be responsible for paying factors’ charges.
Does not sound fair to me, cannot claim 25% discount and will pay 100% of council tax.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards