We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Any TUPE experts out there?

Options
Standupforyourself
Standupforyourself Posts: 193 Forumite
100 Posts First Anniversary
edited 18 April 2019 at 12:01PM in Redundancy & redundancy planning
Hi

I work for a relatively large company (listed on London stock exchange) who have recently agreed to outsource their sales, marketing and distribution functions to another company which means my job and the jobs of several colleagues in my business function are under threat.

My understanding of the situation is that this is a service provision change - i.e. my company will be paying the new company a fee to carry out the same work as is currently carried out here.

Under TUPE i assume we should be transferred to the new company but the reality is this:

- we've been told there are no jobs being created at the other company
- the other company's workforce will absorb the work our company does
- our HR department have offered us a "settlement agreement" should we feel we want to leave
- we've been informally told the business transfer date but have not been told if we will or wont be transferred over to the new company. My assumption is not, and that my current company has indemnified the new company against any claims as part of their commercial agreement (this is an assumption i stress)

Can anyone advise what are my rights in this situation and what action i should be taking?

thanks
«1

Comments

  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,018 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If they genuinely don't need the extra staff then you are looking at redundancy under because of "economic, technical
    or organisational" (ETO) reasons which is allowed under TUPE. They have to jump through all the usual hoops to make you redundant, so there is a chance (but probably a slim one) that someone other than you would get the shove.

    Is the settlement agreement more or less than you would get for redundancy?
  • But should the correct process be that they need to pool us with the current workforce at the other company as we all do the same job?

    My job is not disappearing, it is just going to be done by someone else. To dismiss me on that basis is unfair which is why i assume they have offered me a settlement.
  • the settlement is statutory redundancy plus enhancement
  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 18,873 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I am no expert but this seems to me to be a redundancy situation rather than TUPE.
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Get independent lawyer on the case, as a group it won't cost much to spread the cost.

    Keeping your job will be hard but the offers will go up.

    What is the union saying?
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    I am no expert but this seems to me to be a redundancy situation rather than TUPE.

    Looks like a TUPE.out source of full function

    The redundancy would be the responsibility on the new employer if they have too many people.
  • no union.

    I'm no expert on the law (hence being on here!) but I'm pretty sure the present employer cannot make me redundant as my job will still exist, only in the other company taking on the work.
  • to add, we've been told we wont be transferring. Hence the offer of a settlement i assume.
  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,018 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    But should the correct process be that they need to pool us with the current workforce at the other company as we all do the same job?

    AIUI yes. However it's not difficult to skew the system to give the result they want
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    no union.

    I'm no expert on the law (hence being on here!) but I'm pretty sure the present employer cannot make me redundant as my job will still exist, only in the other company taking on the work.

    Problem is the decision for you and the others to not have jobs unless you can find a suitable alternative has been made.

    Even if you force the transfer using TUPE the new place won't have jobs for you.

    Are they moving people onto your sites or taking the work in house to their own locations?

    If you kick up enough fuss the outsource company might back out, if they think they will get pulled into an ET in a case like this you go after both companies.

    What you need to do is maximise the offer to go quietly, that is going to need some legal support.

    greed to outsource their sales, marketing and distribution functions to another company which means my job and the jobs of several colleagues in my business function are under threat.

    How many people are involved and definitely going?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.