We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
rolling tenancy agreements (1 June legislation )
marc3
Posts: 321 Forumite
Apologies if this is covered in another thread ,but i am not much use with the 'search facility '
simply-we have a tenant on a rolling tenancy which is most likely to extend beyond 1 June.
tenant offered a new tenancy agreement -but chooses to' let it roll '
To the best of my knowledge-the existing AST and its clauses thus remain valid beyond 1 June ,and as a landlord-you do not have to issue a new AST unless the tenant requests (which as above-they wish to simply keep existing one rolling )
Is that correct ?
Apart from fee responsibility and capped deposit changes i don't think much changes anyway,although one thing depicted in the current AST is a possible carpet cleaning cost of £75 upon check out ,which would not be valid from 1 June-,but i ASSUME (always dangerous ) it does not render the current AST null and void ,and we could even still charge it if needs be .
Is that correct ?
Accurate insight/feedback appreciated.
thank you
simply-we have a tenant on a rolling tenancy which is most likely to extend beyond 1 June.
tenant offered a new tenancy agreement -but chooses to' let it roll '
To the best of my knowledge-the existing AST and its clauses thus remain valid beyond 1 June ,and as a landlord-you do not have to issue a new AST unless the tenant requests (which as above-they wish to simply keep existing one rolling )
Is that correct ?
Apart from fee responsibility and capped deposit changes i don't think much changes anyway,although one thing depicted in the current AST is a possible carpet cleaning cost of £75 upon check out ,which would not be valid from 1 June-,but i ASSUME (always dangerous ) it does not render the current AST null and void ,and we could even still charge it if needs be .
Is that correct ?
Accurate insight/feedback appreciated.
thank you
0
Comments
-
Your clause is probably unenforceable anyway.
Tenant just needs to return the property in the same state they received it, less fair wear and tear.
If they have damaged the carpet or left it in such a state that it needs more than usual cleaning, you can make a reasonable deduction for that from their deposit, if you have all the evidence you need to back up your claim.0 -
There is a further year before the legislation comes into force for existing tenancies including periodic extensions.
After then the tenancy will still be valid but it will be illegal to make the charge as a fee. However you could still make a reasonable deposit deduction if you can prove the state of the carpet has deteriorated beyond normal wear and tear.0 -
This is the reason I don't like some landlords, issuing a mandatory cleaning charge at the end of tenancy is unreasonable anyway and I'm glad the law is changing. I always clean at the end of my tenancy and leave it in the same state as before. It's the landlord's responsibility to ensure a full inventory is done before and after so if there are damages they can be charged. Don't punish us good tenants because you had some bad ones!0
-
* which country?
* weekly, monthly, quarterly or annual periodic?
* contractual or statutory periodic?
* dates of periods?
Whatever your tenancy agreement says, you can't charge a fee for cleaning, unless cleaning is required to get the property back to the state it was at the start of the tenancy (less fair w&t).0 -
Thank you for the replies -true communication is the response that you get !!
my fault for not communicating correctly then , but the thread seems to have evolved as a discussion re carpet cleaning;which i merely mentioned as an example of how things are changing;so Sharon 87 -i will let you know if the flat ever becomes available-and unless you rip the carpet to shreds-promise i won't charge you ,and you can decide if you 'like me as a landlord ' .
Main thrust of question which unfortunately no -one has specifically answered , remains that where a current AST 'rolls' ,and tenant does not want a new AST ;is whether any clauses in the current AST remain valid from 1 June ,and in effect,whether an AST raised before 1 June remains valid .
(i think it does but not absolutely certain )0 -
https://www.rla.org.uk/landlord/guides/tenant-fees-ban-guidance.shtml
Existing tenancies have a one year grace period before the charges come into effect.0 -
Didn't anselld in post no 3 answer this for you?
Main thrust of question which unfortunately no -one has specifically answered , remains that where a current AST 'rolls' ,and tenant does not want a new AST ;is whether any clauses in the current AST remain valid from 1 June ,and in effect,whether an AST raised before 1 June remains valid .
(i think it does but not absolutely certain )0 -
Thank you for the replies -true communication is the response that you get !!
my fault for not communicating correctly then , but the thread seems to have evolved as a discussion re carpet cleaning;which i merely mentioned as an example of how things are changing;so Sharon 87 -i will let you know if the flat ever becomes available-and unless you rip the carpet to shreds-promise i won't charge you ,and you can decide if you 'like me as a landlord ' .
Main thrust of question which unfortunately no -one has specifically answered , remains that where a current AST 'rolls' ,and tenant does not want a new AST ;is whether any clauses in the current AST remain valid from 1 June ,and in effect,whether an AST raised before 1 June remains valid .
(i think it does but not absolutely certain )
Will remain valid till 31st June 2020, read the guidance for landlords https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/791273/TFA_Guidance_for_LandlordsAgents.pdfThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
