We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Carer's Allowance refused - Should I fight back alone, or do I need backup?

Options
24

Comments

  • shelleywa
    shelleywa Posts: 125 Forumite
    sportsarb wrote: »
    The departments aren’t run by automatons, there is simply no way to depart from the legislation, it’s more often than not a basic rule that isn’t open to interpretation. It’s ordinary people doing these jobs, and it can be extremely frustrating having to deny benefits to people, harder than paying it to people that take the !!!! out of the system truth be told.

    I understand it must be frustrating for the employees. It would make more sense if these claims could be considered on a case-by-case basis. Refuse the ones repeatedly screwing the system. And approve the ones who are genuine and would actually SAVE the Gov't money on nurse's wages (and simultaneously relieve some of the pressure on those very overworked nurses), instead of breaking families apart and forcing sick elderly folk to die angry and alone. Doesn't make sense :(
  • shelleywa
    shelleywa Posts: 125 Forumite
    Skibunny40 wrote: »
    You can re-apply once you've been in the country long enough to qualify.

    Unfortunately, my Dad doesn't have that long left :(
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    shelleywa wrote: »
    ...dying from terminal cancer. ...
    shelleywa wrote: »
    Unfortunately, my Dad doesn't have that long left :(

    Is he claiming the full Attendance Allowance, which is fast-tracked under "special rules"?

    https://www.mariecurie.org.uk/help/support/benefits-entitlements/living-with-terminal-illness/attendance-allowance
  • pearl123
    pearl123 Posts: 2,082 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Contact Citizens Advice Bureau. It’s free and the can offer help.
  • Browntoa
    Browntoa Posts: 49,604 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    pearl123 wrote: »
    Contact Citizens Advice Bureau. It’s free and the can offer help.

    See post 1 , they tried
    Ex forum ambassador

    Long term forum member
  • M_Python
    M_Python Posts: 176 Forumite
    If you're not having any luck with CAB, you could try Macmillan.
  • pmlindyloo
    pmlindyloo Posts: 13,092 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    M_Python wrote: »
    If you're not having any luck with CAB, you could try Macmillan.

    Or this organisation.

    https://www.carersuk.org/help-and-advice/talk-to-us
  • shelleywa
    shelleywa Posts: 125 Forumite
    Is he claiming the full Attendance Allowance, which is fast-tracked under "special rules"?

    https://www.mariecurie.org.uk/help/support/benefits-entitlements/living-with-terminal-illness/attendance-allowance

    Yes, he is on the Higher rate. They just increased it by £2, I guess that's my wages :D
  • calcotti
    calcotti Posts: 15,696 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    shelleywa wrote: »
    Yes, he is on the Higher rate. They just increased it by £2, I guess that's my wages :D

    That's the annual increase that takes place in April.

    Carer's Allowance is not going to be an option because you fall foul of the rules. As has been suggested you should be able to claim Universal Credit and if successful this would pay you £478.02/month.
    Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.
  • TELLIT01
    TELLIT01 Posts: 18,002 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper PPI Party Pooper
    shelleywa wrote: »
    I understand it must be frustrating for the employees. It would make more sense if these claims could be considered on a case-by-case basis. Refuse the ones repeatedly screwing the system. And approve the ones who are genuine and would actually SAVE the Gov't money on nurse's wages (and simultaneously relieve some of the pressure on those very overworked nurses), instead of breaking families apart and forcing sick elderly folk to die angry and alone. Doesn't make sense :(




    Whilst I understand your frustration, to try to consider each case individually would actually be a recipe for chaos within the system. You could easily get 2 different people reviewing the same case and coming up with a different outcome due to their own perceptions and prejudices. When there are strict rules laid down in order to qualify there is at least consistency.

    How would you identify those 'screwing the system'? People can genuinely be claiming multiple benefits whilst others are very good at knowing legislation and 'adjust' reality so that they fit the requirements.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.