We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Asked for ID

Options
I submitted a claim letter in mid March to NRAM for PPI on a mortgage taken out in 2004. It seems there were two insurances mis-sold. I was always adamant that I didn't have any PPI (ever) so was surprised when I saw this on an old mortgage statement when I was checking it for something else. Around 2 weeks later I received letters from them asking for proof of ID, change of name and a form to complete. The letter stated that it had to be returned with a date only 4 days away. I did this, including a copy of my driving licence as requested and sent it all by secure delivery. Is this a normal request from them and, in others experiences, does this mean that my claim/s are more likely to be successful?

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Yes - they need to make sure they're giving your data to the right person.

    You'd be a tad miffed if they handed it to someone else.

    It doesn't mean your complaint is any more likely to succeed.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    EllyRoo wrote: »
    does this mean that my claim/s are more likely to be successful?
    No, it just means you had to provide proof of your identity before your complaint could be considered.

    How is it that there are TWO mis-sold insurance policies on your mortgage? You are not complaining about Life Insurance or Mortgage Indemnity Guarantee (MIG), are you?

    You should also note that if this insurance was sold to you by a broker in 2004, then that is pre-regulation.

    At the end of the day, no one here can tell you if your complaint will be successful, so you'll just have to wait. :)
  • I don't recall agreeing to either, so I'm not entirely sure, to be honest. My dealings were all with Northern Rock so a broker wasn't involved and the second insurance policy was to do with unemployment and sickness which, given my employment status gave me no added benefit whatsoever. I though I had to take it to get the mortgage. Older and wiser now!
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,672 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I don't recall agreeing to either,

    MIG is not PPI. You also had no choice (apart from putting in a bigger deposit. So, you cant be missold MIG
    Life assurance is not PPI. Lenders did require life assurance as a condition of borrowing until mid to late 90s. That was allowed and still is. You just dont see it much today. So, if it was a condition, it would not be missold.

    The unemployment cover is PPI. NRAM as a soft touch.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.