We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Spare wheel

50Twuncle
50Twuncle Posts: 10,763 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
My Suzuki came without a spare - just a can of foam - I would prefer the security of a full sized spare - and looked in to the cost - Suzuki want over £300 for a steel spare and tyre - Tyreman want £200 for a narrow alloy with a 125/70 17" continental tyre, jack and brace - supposedly the same overall diameter as my full sized tyres (185/55 16)
What would you do ?
«134

Comments

  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Ebay. No need to buy new.
  • 50Twuncle
    50Twuncle Posts: 10,763 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    neilmcl wrote: »
    Ebay. No need to buy new.


    Thanks - just had the same thought - looking now !
  • Carrot007
    Carrot007 Posts: 4,534 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I would do what I did. Go to a scrap yard and get one for cheap. It's onlt a spare it don;t have to be great!


    Though more likely ebay thses daays as most scrap yards are no longer places you can go to. Still cheap though.


    Sure you have a spare jack and brace by now, I have far too many of the things (and make sure it is the proper X one that is actually usable when some idiot forces it on like a dumbass).


    Still all depends on the one you want. I will let you do the search if you are so inclined. I paid around a £10 for one 10 years ago, but a smaller size so probably much cheaper! (15 if i recall right, but could have been 16, I really cannot remember (and it bares no relation to current pricing anyway)!).
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    50Twuncle wrote: »
    ...125/70 17"...
    supposedly the same overall diameter as my full sized tyres (185/55 16)

    125/70 17 is a total diameter of ((70% of 125mm) x 2) + 17" = 607mm
    185/55 16 is a total diameter of ((55% of 185mm) x 2) + 16" = 610mm

    So, yes, they're pretty damn near the exact same overall diameter.
  • DavidT67
    DavidT67 Posts: 571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Is it actually worth the expense and extra weight in the car?
    When have you ever had to change a wheel by the side of the road in the past?
    Could you do it under pressure on the hard shoulder of a busy motorway? Would you want to?

    Manufacturers don't put them in new cars by default as it improves the MPG figures.
    (Same reason they are making the fuel tanks smaller, but that's another issue)

    NB I've used the sealant cans twice and they are quick and simply to use, downside is the tyre then has to be replaced rather than repaired, but that's the compromise. for saving weight and gaining boot space day to day.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    DavidT67 wrote: »
    Manufacturers don't put them in new cars by default as it improves the MPG figures.
    (Same reason they are making the fuel tanks smaller, but that's another issue)
    This is not the reason.

    The additional weight is utterly negligible, especially given how ridiculously heavy many modern cars are anyway.

    The two main reasons that fewer manufacturers supply spares are very simple - cost-saving, and simple packaging given how ridiculously large many modern wheels and tyres are.
  • DavidT67
    DavidT67 Posts: 571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Hmm, well Mercedes felt it was worth reducing their 'standard' fuel tank size from 66 to 50 and then 40 litres to make their MPG figures look better. So circa 10 kilos for a spare wheel and associated packaging was no doubt factored in also.
  • couriervanman
    couriervanman Posts: 1,667 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    DavidT67 wrote: »
    Is it actually worth the expense and extra weight in the car?
    When have you ever had to change a wheel by the side of the road in the past?
    Could you do it under pressure on the hard shoulder of a busy motorway? Would you want to?

    Manufacturers don't put them in new cars by default as it improves the MPG figures.
    (Same reason they are making the fuel tanks smaller, but that's another issue)

    NB I've used the sealant cans twice and they are quick and simply to use, downside is the tyre then has to be replaced rather than repaired, but that's the compromise. for saving weight and gaining boot space day to day.

    "NB I've used the sealant cans twice and they are quick and simply to use, downside is the tyre then has to be replaced rather than repaired, but that's the compromise. for saving weight and gaining boot space day to day."

    Well I've had 2 punctures in last 18 months car and small van.....no can of gunk would have worked luckily both had spare tyres
    At the end of the day......sods law you have a puncture on a wet windy day in the middle of nowhere and your phone battery is flat,id rather have the security of a spare wheel
  • George_Michael
    George_Michael Posts: 4,251 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    DavidT67 wrote: »
    Manufacturers don't put them in new cars by default as it improves the MPG figures.
    (Same reason they are making the fuel tanks smaller, but that's another issue)

    If these figures from the American EPA are correct (and I see no reason to think that they are not),
    https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.jsp
    an extra weight of about 45kg in your car will result in a loss of fuel efficiency of 1%.

    Say around 15kg for a modern alloy wheel and tyre (and quite a bit less for a spacesaver) and you are talking about a difference in fuel economy of 0.3% for the full size spare wheel. (or to put it another way, for a car that averages 40 mpg, the reduced figure will now be 39.88 mpg.
    Not really too much for manufacturers to worry about.
  • couriervanman
    couriervanman Posts: 1,667 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If these figures from the American EPA are correct (and I see no reason to think that they are not),
    https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.jsp
    an extra weight of about 45kg in your car will result in a loss of fuel efficiency of 1%.

    Say around 15kg for a modern alloy wheel and tyre (and quite a bit less for a spacesaver) and you are talking about a difference in fuel economy of 0.3% for the full size spare wheel. (or to put it another way, for a car that averages 40 mpg, the reduced figure will now be 39.88 mpg.
    Not really too much for manufacturers to worry about.

    Spot on......just a way to reduce costs but then charge people £200 plus for a replacement
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.