We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

shared ownership how to break free??

2»

Comments

  • HampshireH
    HampshireH Posts: 5,032 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    To be honest (and its a hard one to hear)

    Your HA have little/no responsibility. It isn't like being a social tenant.

    To all extents and purposes you are homeowner and it is your problem (harsh but true to your HA).

    A poster above asked if the HA would put you into one of their rented units.

    This would be a no go most likely. Those houses are for people who have waited sometimes decades to get housed. You cannot just bypass the system.

    The only time I have known people in SO be rehoused by the HA is in times of severe debt where they were owned thousands in rent and the lender was seeking their share also. In such cases (I had experience of working on 2) it really was a last resort and came after the threat of kids had been removed due to being unable to be cared for etc due to the money issues & housing issues . The circumstances really do need to be dire & this happened with full multiagency cooperation. (May be easier in other boroughs/counties)

    Realistically if there is capital in the property & a wage OP could rent. Her husband could get a job in addition to self employment to support the family. It would become a reassessment of priority.
  • TanSki
    TanSki Posts: 17 Forumite
    HampshireH wrote: »
    To be honest (and its a hard one to hear)

    Your HA have little/no responsibility. It isn't like being a social tenant.

    To all extents and purposes you are homeowner and it is your problem (harsh but true to your HA).

    A poster above asked if the HA would put you into one of their rented units.

    This would be a no go most likely. Those houses are for people who have waited sometimes decades to get housed. You cannot just bypass the system.

    The only time I have known people in SO be rehoused by the HA is in times of severe debt where they were owned thousands in rent and the lender was seeking their share also. In such cases (I had experience of working on 2) it really was a last resort and came after the threat of kids had been removed due to being unable to be cared for etc due to the money issues & housing issues . The circumstances really do need to be dire & this happened with full multiagency cooperation. (May be easier in other boroughs/counties)

    Realistically if there is capital in the property & a wage OP could rent. Her husband could get a job in addition to self employment to support the family. It would become a reassessment of priority.

    Thank you for your detailed reply. I think I knew all of this deep down I was just hoping there was a way out, that I hadn't already been aware of :( thank you once again. We are hoping to look into Heylo Housing 'buy your own home' scheme. its similar to shared ownership but with no mortgage. you need 10% of the value of the property, which I'm hoping we could raise following the sale of our flat.
  • AdrianC
    AdrianC Posts: 42,189 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Seems like you've got three basic choices.

    1. Shrug and hand the keys back to the HA, then just walk away.
    2. Sell your 25% with short lease.
    3. Extend the lease.

    It's all down to the precise numbers... You have 25% of a flat that with a long lease would be worth £250k-300k. That's £62,500-75,000.

    Statutory lease extension would be somewhere around £20-25k, based on a non-shared ownership flat. I have no idea how that would work with SA. But I find it very difficult to believe that it's really going to work out anywhere short of massively worthwhile to extend the lease... Whether you can raise the funds is another question, of course.
  • TanSki
    TanSki Posts: 17 Forumite
    Hi and thank you for your reply. We have decided to try and sell and extend the lease as it would add an extra 90 years on top of the current 72years left. we are responsible for 25% of the premium of extending. so works out around £5/6k including legal fees which adds an extra £15k to the overall value of the property, so I feel its worth it in the long run.

    We are just worried ( my husband and I) whether to use the Heylo scheme as the rent is calculated at 4.89% of the un-purchased mount ( this is so high), in order to benefit we are now considering moving outside of London but using the Heylo 'your home' scheme.

    Just need to see how soon we can sell, we've had an open day today with lots of interest. selling the flat means we have to cover the legal fees for both ends :( ...The housing association charge an admin fee of 1% plus VAT on the overall price of the property, not the share, which amounts to £3,800, criminal!!!
  • You lucky they only asking for 25% of the premium as mine(Metropolitan Trust) is asking for the full 100% despite only owing 40%
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.